Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 12:20:24, schrieb Liviu Andronic > > >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> >> Will now try automake. > >> > Same error. > >> Should I file this on the bug tracker? > > I think yes. > http:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 12:20:24, schrieb Liviu Andronic > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Will now try automake. > > > > Same error. > > > Should I file this on the bug tracker? > > Liviu I think yes. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digit

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Will now try automake. > > Same error. > Should I file this on the bug tracker? Liviu

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> If it's not too much of a pain, could you document the packaging >> procedure for Ubuntu and LyX? >> >> At this point it's only a question out of curiosity and not necessity >> so re

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > If it's not too much of a pain, could you document the packaging > procedure for Ubuntu and LyX? > > At this point it's only a question out of curiosity and not necessity > so really if it's an extra pain to document it, don't worry about.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 10:53:05, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 10:21:18, schrieb Liviu Andronic > > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Did not try. And did you try cmake? :) > > > > > Well, I'd rather not. I am trying to cook 2.1dev for m

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Are you aware of "make package" in cmake? I am using it all the time. >> > No, I didn't know that. But since I'm trying to come up with a rather > specific setup, I need to tinker manua

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Are you aware of "make package" in cmake? I am using it all the time. > No, I didn't know that. But since I'm trying to come up with a rather specific setup, I need to tinker manually with the packaging info. > > Will now try automake. > Than

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2012 um 10:21:18, schrieb Liviu Andronic > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Did not try. And did you try cmake? :) > > > Well, I'd rather not. I am trying to cook 2.1dev for my Ubuntu PPA and > the debian packaging uses autotools, Are you aware of "

Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Did not try. And did you try cmake? :) > Well, I'd rather not. I am trying to cook 2.1dev for my Ubuntu PPA and the debian packaging uses autotools, and I'd rather stick to that (not least because I'm not very familiar with cmake). So is it pos

Re: Re: Re: Re: trunk fails to: ./configure --without-included-boost

2012-10-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 um 23:45:53, schrieb Liviu Andronic > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > I, too have Precise ..., so this should not be the reason. > > > > > several liboost 1.40.0 libraries laying around. > > > > I have too, so no problem either ... > > > Hmm, b