Richard Heck wrote:
Sectioning sounds right to me.
Kornel, can you do the change yourself?
Jürgen
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012 um 09:45:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
sp...@lyx.org
Richard Heck wrote:
Sectioning sounds right to me.
Kornel, can you do the change yourself?
I will.
Jürgen
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Richard Heck wrote:
> Sectioning sounds right to me.
Kornel, can you do the change yourself?
Jürgen
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012 um 09:45:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > Sectioning sounds right to me.
>
> Kornel, can you do the change yourself?
I will.
> Jürgen
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Kornel Benko wrote:
1.) Could we please rename
Category Section
to
Category Section[[structure]]
That way we may translate it e.g. in German to Gliederung instead
of Abschnitt.
Sectioning strikes me the better English term, and it would
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 13:31:41, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
sp...@lyx.org
Kornel Benko wrote:
1.) Could we please rename
Category Section
to
Category Section[[structure]]
That way we may translate it e.g. in German to
Kornel Benko wrote:
Sectioning strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the
problem.
OK, please.
I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first.
I missed this one. But the sorting here is only alphabetic (in the
translated language) and only inside a category. (My
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 13:49:32, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
sp...@lyx.org
Kornel Benko wrote:
Sectioning strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the
problem.
OK, please.
I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first.
According to LaTeX companion
Kornel Benko wrote:
You mean inside some concrete layout-files?
Yes.
I had in mind to define somewhere a category-priority, (may it be in
preferences, or some category-config.layout file) This way there would be
no change to existing layouts. In case of nothing defined, we may stick to
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
Sectioning strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the
problem.
OK, please.
I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first.
I'd be happy to give my opinion but I don't know
On 12/27/2012 12:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
Sectioning strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the
problem.
OK, please.
I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first.
I'd
Kornel Benko wrote:
> 1.) Could we please rename
> Category Section
> to
> Category Section[[structure]]
>
> That way we may translate it e.g. in German to "Gliederung" instead
> of "Abschnitt".
"Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 13:31:41, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > 1.) Could we please rename
> > Category Section
> > to
> > Category Section[[structure]]
> >
> > That way we may translate it e.g. in
Kornel Benko wrote:
> > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the
> > problem.
>
> OK, please.
I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first.
> I missed this one. But the sorting here is only alphabetic (in the
> translated language) and only inside a
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 13:49:32, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the
> > > problem.
> >
> > OK, please.
>
> I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first.
According
Kornel Benko wrote:
> You mean inside some concrete layout-files?
Yes.
> I had in mind to define somewhere a category-priority, (may it be in
> preferences, or some category-config.layout file) This way there would be
> no change to existing layouts. In case of nothing defined, we may stick to
>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the
>> > problem.
>>
>> OK, please.
>
> I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first.
I'd be happy to give my opinion
On 12/27/2012 12:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
"Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the
problem.
OK, please.
I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first.
18 matches
Mail list logo