Am Samstag, den 15.08.2020, 09:18 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> All latex errors due to export to pdf(xetex)
>
> ! Package polyglossia Error: The current latin font TlwgMono(0) does
> not contai
> n the "Thai" script!
> ...
> Missing character: There is no ภ in font [lmroman10-
>
Am Sat, 15 Aug 2020 08:24:12 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Samstag, den 15.08.2020, 07:57 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Failing:
> > export/export/latex/languages/en-th_utf8_pdf4_systemF
> This compiles for me (non-TeX fonts, XeTeX).
All latex errors due to export to pdf(xetex)
!
Am Samstag, den 15.08.2020, 07:57 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Failing:
> export/export/latex/languages/en-th_utf8_pdf4_systemF
This compiles for me (non-TeX fonts, XeTeX).
> export/doc/ru/Math_(dvi|pdf)[345]_.*F
Compiles for me as well (DVI, pstopdf)
>
Am Sat, 15 Aug 2020 07:09:14 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> > Next waiting tests would be
> > export/doc/ru/Math_.*
> > export/examples/ru/Graphics_and_Insets/XY-Figure.*
>
> Could you please re-check once more after 04ba887e2c77?
>
These passes now:
Am Freitag, den 14.08.2020, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> The following tests have now passed:
> export/doc/es/UserGuide_dvi
> export/doc/es/UserGuide_dvi3_texF
> export/doc/es/UserGuide_pdf
> DEFAULTOUTPUT_export/doc/es/UserGuide_pdf2
> export/doc/es/UserGuide_pdf3
>
Am Fri, 14 Aug 2020 10:24:10 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, den 14.08.2020, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > export/export/latex/languages/en-th_utf8_pdf4_systemF
> >
> > export/doc/es/Additional_(dvi3|pdf[45])_systemF
>
> This means these two with
Am Freitag, den 14.08.2020, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> export/export/latex/languages/en-th_utf8_pdf4_systemF
>
> export/doc/es/Additional_(dvi3|pdf[45])_systemF
This means these two with non-TeX fonts and XeTeX or LuaTeX, right?
These compile for me without error.
Am Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:51:23 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, den 14.08.2020, 09:10 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > Of these, only es/Additional.lyx is left after ef11fdc77dc617ec.
>
> and that's addressed at 70eb8c37cb2f0029.
>
> Any more breaking cases left?
>
>
Am Freitag, den 14.08.2020, 09:10 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Of these, only es/Additional.lyx is left after ef11fdc77dc617ec.
and that's addressed at 70eb8c37cb2f0029.
Any more breaking cases left?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 16:16 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Remaining for instance doc/(es|fr)/(Additional|UserGuide).lyx
Of these, only es/Additional.lyx is left after ef11fdc77dc617ec.
Looking at that next.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 01:45:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 13:41 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > I do not understand what you mean. You should simply revert 1af67974
> > and the apply that patch.
>
> I did that, and it re-introduced what I fixed. I
Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 16:16:35 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:28:04 +0200
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > > For the next bunch, you may try to compile doc/es/UserGuide.lyx or
> > >
Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:28:04 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > For the next bunch, you may try to compile doc/es/UserGuide.lyx or
> > doc/de/Customization.lyx
>
> The latter's fixed.
>
> Jürgen
OK, next bunch successful
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> For the next bunch, you may try to compile doc/es/UserGuide.lyx or
> doc/de/Customization.lyx
The latter's fixed.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:05:58 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 11:56 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > While testing I see many new errors. As an example try
> > doc/de/UserGuide.lyx.
>
> This one's fixed. What about the others?
>
> Jürgen
These pass now:
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 11:56 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> While testing I see many new errors. As an example try
> doc/de/UserGuide.lyx.
This one's fixed. What about the others?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 13:42 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Sorry, cannot check it beacuse I cannot typeset chinese.
> What is the problem?
Missing '}'. You'll see that in the Source.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 01:45:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 13:41 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > I do not understand what you mean. You should simply revert 1af67974
> > and the apply that patch.
>
> I did that, and it re-introduced what I fixed. I
Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:35:45 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:14:42 +0200
> schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > > > While testing I see many new errors. As an example try
> > > > doc/de/UserGuide.lyx.
> > >
> > > Kornel, do you see errors if you revert 1af67974 and then
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 13:41 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> I do not understand what you mean. You should simply revert 1af67974
> and the apply that patch.
I did that, and it re-introduced what I fixed. I will go ahead and fix
the error Kornel spotted, then you can do your changes on
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:58:56PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > Please, can you revert 1af67974 and then apply the attached patch to
> > see whether what you fixed remains fixed?
>
> No, it is broken. See attachment.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:41:00PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > First of all, the fix for #8384 does not work if an inset is not the
> > first thing in a selection.
>
> That's what I fixed.
Good. I now checked it.
Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:14:42 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> > > While testing I see many new errors. As an example try
> > > doc/de/UserGuide.lyx.
> >
> > Kornel, do you see errors if you revert 1af67974 and then apply the
> > patch (multipar.diff) attached to the other email in this
Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:21:37 +0200
schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:06:07 +0200
> > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> >
> > > Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2020, 09:19 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > > > I fixed
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Please, can you revert 1af67974 and then apply the attached patch to
> see whether what you fixed remains fixed?
No, it is broken. See attachment.
Jürgen
cn_Tutorial.lyx
Description: application/lyx
signature.asc
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 12:21 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Kornel, do you see errors if you revert 1af67974 and then apply the
> patch (multipar.diff) attached to the other email in this thread?
OK, I'll check.
J.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> First of all, the fix for #8384 does not work if an inset is not the
> first thing in a selection.
That's what I fixed.
> Secondly, I don't think the inheritFont()
> method is the right thing to use in this case. The fix
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:06:07 +0200
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2020, 09:19 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > > I fixed the manual which used odd emphases. There is still a bug in
> > > LyX
> > >
Am Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:06:07 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2020, 09:19 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > I fixed the manual which used odd emphases. There is still a bug in
> > LyX
> > > which I am going to investigate.
> >
> > Sounds good, thanks. The
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:06:07AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2020, 09:19 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > I fixed the manual which used odd emphases. There is still a bug in
> > LyX
> > > which I am going to investigate.
> >
> > Sounds good, thanks. The zh_CN
Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2020, 09:19 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I fixed the manual which used odd emphases. There is still a bug in
> LyX
> > which I am going to investigate.
>
> Sounds good, thanks. The zh_CN Tutorial.lyx now compiles for me.
Should be fixed now generally. I'd not be
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 08:24:28AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 22:49 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I get the following:
> >
> > Runaway argument?
> > {\emph {包含了调整文档格式的详细方法，包括水平填�\ETC.
> > ! File ended while scanning use of \textit .
> >
> >
Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 22:49 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I get the following:
>
> Runaway argument?
> {\emph {包含了调整文档格式的详细方法，包括水平填�\ETC.
> ! File ended while scanning use of \textit .
>
> \par
> <*> Tutorial.tex
I fixed the manual which used odd emphases.
I get the following:
Runaway argument?
{\emph {包含了调整文档格式的详细方法，包括水平填�\ETC.
! File ended while scanning use of \textit .
\par
<*> Tutorial.tex
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
34 matches
Mail list logo
