Le 23/07/2019 à 01:02, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:19:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Note that It might be that I am wrong, and that git is able
to follow this quite well.
It is able, but you might need extra params like when searching
through log history (eg
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:19:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Note that It might be that I am wrong, and that git is able
> to follow this quite well.
It is able, but you might need extra params like when searching
through log history (eg from now you have to git log --follow -p
Le 21/07/2019 à 12:37, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 12:34 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Can you push please ?
Sure, done. The file was only renamed, right? No changes in content?
Thanks. That's perfect.
JMarc
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 12:34 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Can you push please ?
Sure, done. The file was only renamed, right? No changes in content?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Le 21 juillet 2019 11:33:54 GMT+02:00, "Jürgen Spitzmüller" a
écrit :
>Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 11:07 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> Yes, I did a mv instead of git mv.
>>
>> Fixed now.
>
>Did you push?
>
>Jürgen
Probably not :) But I am not home until this evening now.
Can you push
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 11:07 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Yes, I did a mv instead of git mv.
>
> Fixed now.
Did you push?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Le 21/07/2019 à 09:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 09:17 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Is it possible that you renamed qt4.m4 to qt.m4 and forgot to add the
new file? Here, qt4.m4 where the above macro is defined, has been
removed without replacement.
... and
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 09:17 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Is it possible that you renamed qt4.m4 to qt.m4 and forgot to add the
> new file? Here, qt4.m4 where the above macro is defined, has been
> removed without replacement.
... and readding it (renamed) seems to fix building.
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 08:47 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> configure now fails for me with:
>
> ./configure: line 9472: syntax error near unexpected token `4.5.0'
> ./configure: line 9472: `QT_DO_IT_ALL(4.5.0)'
>
> This is after make distclean and ./autogen.sh
Is it possible that you
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 00:15 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> I have done it now.
configure now fails for me with:
./configure: line 9472: syntax error near unexpected token `4.5.0'
./configure: line 9472: `QT_DO_IT_ALL(4.5.0)'
This is after make distclean and ./autogen.sh
Jürgen
>
Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2019, 00:15:57 CEST schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 20/07/2019 à 20:35, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >> I think that would be fine and, potentially, save some hassle.
> >>
> >> Riki
> >
> > +1 for doing it as soon as possible (now?)
> > I will take care for the cmake part.
>
Le 20/07/2019 à 20:35, Kornel Benko a écrit :
I think that would be fine and, potentially, save some hassle.
Riki
+1 for doing it as soon as possible (now?)
I will take care for the cmake part.
I have done it now. The cmake part should not be too difficult
considering what I had to do.
Am Samstag, 20. Juli 2019, 14:23:05 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> On 7/20/19 1:01 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 19.07.2019, 21:19 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> >> It is more and more absurd to have a front end named qt4 these days.
> >> What about renaming
On 7/20/19 1:01 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 19.07.2019, 21:19 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> It is more and more absurd to have a front end named qt4 these days.
>> What about renaming everything qt? It looks like a good idea before
>> release to ease backport. Note
Am Freitag, den 19.07.2019, 21:19 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> It is more and more absurd to have a front end named qt4 these days.
> What about renaming everything qt? It looks like a good idea before
> release to ease backport. Note that It might be that I am wrong, and
> that git is
It is more and more absurd to have a front end named qt4 these days.
What about renaming everything qt? It looks like a good idea before
release to ease backport. Note that It might be that I am wrong, and
that git is able to follow this quite well.
JMarc
16 matches
Mail list logo
