On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:03:19PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> I bet that 2.2.0 will be released also for Windows, whether you stop or not.
> Either some new face pops out of the dark as Pavel suggested, or we'll
> cross-compile with mingw (and possibly provide a much more basic installer).
> BT
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:05:54PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> For me it's ok now with the attached patch. Perhaps it can be further
> improved.
> But now it's usable already. Does it work on Linux too?
Yes it does. In fact, it even improves things on Linux (at least with
the 5.6alpha I'm test
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What frustrates me is that the LyX developers deny to work also for lyX
> on Windows.
Sorry, I do not understand how you got that impression. Over the past years
you've got a lot of windows-specific help from several developers, most
notably Vincent, Peter and Enrico. Peter a
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Besides this, if I stop right now then there won't be a LyX 2.2 for Windows
> I assume. But development continues and if anybody wants to restart LyX for
> Windows in a few months, e.g. CMake won't be in the state to compile on
> Windows. I remember also a lot of compilation e
Am 09.12.2015 um 09:53 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:02:42AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> I'll give Qt 5.6 another try. But I doubt it will change the problems
>> with the F&R dialog. There is some fundamental problem with it.
>> Otherwise it wouldn't open with the too
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:02:42AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> I'll give Qt 5.6 another try. But I doubt it will change the problems
> with the F&R dialog. There is some fundamental problem with it.
> Otherwise it wouldn't open with the too small geometry. I'll attach a
> screen shot to show you
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 07:20:33AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 um 00:33:23, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> Looks like 'keycode 133' changed. I had Meta_L, but default now is Super_L.
> Same for 'keycode 134', Meta_R -> Super_R
> Works now :), until next change :(
Th
Am Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 um 00:33:23, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:25:10AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 20:09:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
>
> > > > > I will try 5.6 beta when it is released. If I cannot reproduce and you
> > >
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:25:10AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 20:09:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > > > I will try 5.6 beta when it is released. If I cannot reproduce and you
> > > > can reproduce, we should confirm we are using the same Qt version and
> > >
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 20:09:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:02:14AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 18:23:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Beca
On 12/08/2015 05:48 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> my goal is (or I should say it was) that as many people as possible
> use LyX. On over 90% of all desktop PCs Windows is used as OS so to
> reach my goal I have to focus on Windows, no matter if I like that OS
> or not.
This may be true in a global sense,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:02:14AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 18:23:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > > Because neither Stephan nor Uwe can reproduce #9683, I have marked it as
> > > > "os=
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 18:23:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > > Because neither Stephan nor Uwe can reproduce #9683, I have marked it as
> > > "os=unix". Do you agree that #9683 is not a blocker for releasing 2.2.0
> > >
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Because neither Stephan nor Uwe can reproduce #9683, I have marked it as
> > "os=unix". Do you agree that #9683 is not a blocker for releasing 2.2.0
> > with Qt 5.5.1 on Mac and Windows? (There is potentially another blocker
> > in
Am 08.12.2015 um 06:13 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Uwe, there is no point why you should burn out because of this. If Windows
users have very little spirit to contribute back, you simply announce the stop
for a few months or work just on manuals, which is your biggest strength
anyway and let new volunt
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 15:25:14, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:26:15AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Am 06.12.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> >
> > > Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 21:45:23, schrieb Stephan Witt
> > >
> > >> Am 06.12.2015 um 21:00 schr
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:26:15AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 06.12.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 21:45:23, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> >> Am 06.12.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Korne
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:58:27PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > But what I can reproduce is bug #9889.
> > With Qt 5.4.2 the Advanced-Find-and-Replace dialog is resizable with 5.5.1
> > it isn't.
>
> Open Advanced-Find-and-Replace dialog and try some shortcuts there. Does it
> work for you?
>
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I don't want to sound rude, I just desperately need another developer on
> Windows. I am close to quit LyX because I don't know compiler things and I
> don't have enough spare time to learn this. When I go who can then provide
> a native Windows build of LyX?
Uwe, there is no
Am 07.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> I am now trying out this:
> https://github.com/kahrl/gettext-msvc
this worked fine. So I have now compiled all libraries with MSVC 2013.
The remaining issue is now:
The determination of the macro ICONV_CONST would need to be adjusted in
cmake. The cp
Am 07.12.2015 um 22:26 schrieb Georg Baum:
>> Then LyX for Windows is dead.
Not at all. But maybe I should stop trying to help with MSVC and use the
time to study cross-compilation with mingw, the ROI is probably much better
for this alternative.
Why don't you install Windows and use MSVC? I
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 07.12.2015 um 20:58 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
>>> So since I cannot compile iconv and friends with MSVC 2013, I cannot
>>> release a LyX 2.2 version?
>>
>> There are only two options: Either you recompile all dependencies
>> (including qt btw, if no binary package compiled with
Am 07.12.2015 um 20:58 schrieb Georg Baum:
So since I cannot compile iconv and friends with MSVC 2013, I cannot
release a LyX 2.2 version?
There are only two options: Either you recompile all dependencies (including
qt btw, if no binary package compiled with MSVC 2013 is offered)
Then LyX fo
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 06.12.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
>>> Good news: I am able to compile LyX 2.2.0alpha2 with Qt 5.5.1 using MSVC
>>> 2013 (32bit).
>>
>> Did you recompile the dependencies iconv, hunspell and zlib with MSVC
>> 2013?
>
> Of course not. I don't know how to do this and w
Am 06.12.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 21:45:23, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
>> Am 06.12.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 05:12:30, schrieb Uwe St
Am 06.12.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Georg Baum:
Good news: I am able to compile LyX 2.2.0alpha2 with Qt 5.5.1 using MSVC
2013 (32bit).
Did you recompile the dependencies iconv, hunspell and zlib with MSVC 2013?
Of course not. I don't know how to do this and who did this in the past.
If you did
Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 21:45:23, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 06.12.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 05:12:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> >>
> >>> Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott
Am 06.12.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 05:12:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
>>
>>> Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>>>
We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 05:12:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> > Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> >
> > > We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6 [1]. However, a
> > > couple of things have changed sinc
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:32:20PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> > Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> >
> >> We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6 [1]. However, a
> >> couple of things have changed since that conversation began that make me
> >> t
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6 [1]. However, a
>> couple of things have changed since that conversation began that make me
>> think we should release with 5.5.1:
>>
>> 1. 5.5.1 has been released.
>
>
Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 05:12:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6 [1]. However, a
> > couple of things have changed since that conversation began that make me
> > think we should release with
Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6 [1]. However, a
couple of things have changed since that conversation began that make me
think we should release with 5.5.1:
1. 5.5.1 has been released.
Good news: I am able to compile LyX 2
We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6 [1]. However, a
couple of things have changed since that conversation began that make me
think we should release with 5.5.1:
1. 5.5.1 has been released.
2. 5.6.0beta1 has been delayed five times so far [2]. Supposedly, it
will be released "as
34 matches
Mail list logo
