Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-08 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Hi, Once upon a time, I heard Jean-Marc Lasgouttes say Please tell me what are the open bugs you consider important for 1.1.6fix2. Also tell me if I forgot some of the changes. Some known problems are: - slowness when running LaTeX due to some libstdc++ versions (shipped with

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-08 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Once upon a time, I heard Chanop Silpa-Anan say Hi, Once upon a time, I heard Jean-Marc Lasgouttes say Please tell me what are the open bugs you consider important for 1.1.6fix2. Also tell me if I forgot some of the changes. Some known problems are: - slowness when running

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-08 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Hi, Once upon a time, I heard Jean-Marc Lasgouttes say > Please tell me what are the open bugs you consider important for > 1.1.6fix2. Also tell me if I forgot some of the changes. > > Some known problems are: > > - slowness when running LaTeX due to some libstdc++ versions (shipped > with

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-08 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Once upon a time, I heard Chanop Silpa-Anan say > Hi, > > Once upon a time, I heard Jean-Marc Lasgouttes say > > > Please tell me what are the open bugs you consider important for > > 1.1.6fix2. Also tell me if I forgot some of the changes. > > > > Some known problems are: > > > > - slowness

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-05 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Once upon a time, I heard Jean-Marc Lasgouttes say Please tell me what are the open bugs you consider important for 1.1.6fix2. Also tell me if I forgot some of the changes. Some known problems are: - slowness when running LaTeX due to some libstdc++ versions (shipped with debian?) Do

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-05 Thread John Levon
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: BTW, I have not been able to check out from anonymous cvs (anoncvs.lyx.org) anymore. My ping is lost .. Currently you must use anoncvs.us.lyx.org instead. If you have a checked out tree already, you can use cvschroot.pl from cvsutils available

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-05 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Once upon a time, I heard Jean-Marc Lasgouttes say > Please tell me what are the open bugs you consider important for > 1.1.6fix2. Also tell me if I forgot some of the changes. > > Some known problems are: > > - slowness when running LaTeX due to some libstdc++ versions (shipped > with

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-05 Thread John Levon
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: > BTW, I have not been able to check out from anonymous cvs > (anoncvs.lyx.org) anymore. My ping is lost .. Currently you must use anoncvs.us.lyx.org instead. If you have a checked out tree already, you can use cvschroot.pl from cvsutils

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I will be away until wednesday. If you want, I can tag 1.1.6fix2 and send you an announcement. Then I could prepare a patch when I am back. The alternative is to wait until next wednesday. If you wait I'll work on getting the other sigc++ related

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the Allan only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his Allan fixes so he can check out the fix series as well in case Allan there's something there not in the main

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan If you wait I'll work on getting the other sigc++ related fixes Allan of Michael's ported to 1_1_6 so that that release should be Allan more portable. If you are positively sure you can get it to work and it will not break other compilers,

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his fixes so he can check out the fix series as well in case there's something there not in the main tree. May as well make that branch as solid as possible since we'll

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the Allan only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his Allan fixes so he can check out the fix series as well in case

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:56:36AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: I don't have this problem on my machine. Do you have gcc 2.96 ? No. I have gcc-2.95.2. The problem was/is one of not regenerating the output file when one of the included png or pdf figures has changed. This was using the

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:11:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ... What's new == ** Updates ... - updated german, danish, finnish basque and polish translations; updated french documentation Amir comited an updated portuguese translation. -- José

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Hello, | | Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed Lars since 1.1.6fix1. | My plan is to release 1.1.6fix2 soon Lars (tomorrow?). Lars, will you be | able today or

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:10:14AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Hopefully we'll get a few more people interested in testing the beta releases this time around. Which reminds me that the buffer-update pdf2 doesn't in 1.2.0cvs. I didn't try other update types because all I could generate with the

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote: On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:10:14AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Hopefully we'll get a few more people interested in testing the beta releases this time around. Which reminds me that the buffer-update pdf2 doesn't in 1.2.0cvs. I didn't try other update

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I will be away until wednesday. If you want, I can tag 1.1.6fix2 and > send you an announcement. Then I could prepare a patch when I am back. > > The alternative is to wait until next wednesday. If you wait I'll work on getting the other sigc++

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the Allan> only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his Allan> fixes so he can check out the fix series as well in case Allan> there's something there not

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> If you wait I'll work on getting the other sigc++ related fixes Allan> of Michael's ported to 1_1_6 so that that release should be Allan> more portable. If you are positively sure you can get it to work and it will not break other

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his fixes so he can check out the fix series as well in case there's something there not in the main tree. May as well make that branch as solid as possible since we'll

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> Okay, just do 1.1.6fix2 with what we have now. Michael was the > Allan> only one complaining anyway. I'll still look at backporting his > Allan> fixes so he can check out the fix series

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:56:36AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > I don't have this problem on my machine. > > Do you have gcc 2.96 ? > > No. I have gcc-2.95.2. > > The problem was/is one of not regenerating the output file when one of the > included png or pdf figures has changed. This was using

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:11:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ... > What's new > == > > ** Updates ... > - updated german, danish, finnish basque and polish translations; > updated french documentation Amir comited an updated portuguese translation. -- José

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> Hello, | | Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed Lars> since 1.1.6fix1. | My plan is to release 1.1.6fix2 soon Lars> (tomorrow?). Lars, will you be | able

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:10:14AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > Hopefully we'll get a few more people interested in testing the beta > releases this time around. Which reminds me that the "buffer-update pdf2" > doesn't in 1.2.0cvs. I didn't try other update types because all I could > generate

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-04 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:10:14AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > Hopefully we'll get a few more people interested in testing the beta > > releases this time around. Which reminds me that the "buffer-update pdf2" > > doesn't in 1.2.0cvs. I didn't try other

So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Hello, Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed since 1.1.6fix1. My plan is to release 1.1.6fix2 soon (tomorrow?). Lars, will you be able today or tomorrow to prepare a tar file if I flag the version? I'll do the updloads, patch and announcement. Kayvan, will you be able to provide a

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hello, | | Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed since 1.1.6fix1. | My plan is to release 1.1.6fix2 soon (tomorrow?). Lars, will you be | able today or tomorrow to prepare a tar file if I flag the version? | I'll do the updloads,

So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Hello, Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed since 1.1.6fix1. My plan is to release 1.1.6fix2 soon (tomorrow?). Lars, will you be able today or tomorrow to prepare a tar file if I flag the version? I'll do the updloads, patch and announcement. Kayvan, will you be able to provide a

Re: So, when should 1.1.6fix2 go out (status update #5)

2001-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hello, | | Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed since 1.1.6fix1. | My plan is to release 1.1.6fix2 soon (tomorrow?). Lars, will you be | able today or tomorrow to prepare a tar file if I flag the version? | I'll do the updloads,