Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-05 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 05-Mar-2002 Martin Vermeer wrote: > One thing I don't quite like, or find elegant, in your patch is the way > you handle the case where a depth-delta'd paragraph in the buffer > acquires a negative depth. Apparently you just switch off depth-deltaing > at that point! Hmmm I did think of it

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-05 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:56:10AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > On 04-Mar-2002 Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > Good luck (I mean it.) In the meantime, find attached the simple version > > of the patch, which fixes the bug and does nothing more. > > I don't think there is luck involved. Anyway hav

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-05 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 04-Mar-2002 Martin Vermeer wrote: > Good luck (I mean it.) In the meantime, find attached the simple version > of the patch, which fixes the bug and does nothing more. I don't think there is luck involved. Anyway have a look at the fix I just comitted if you're interested. Jug --

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:44:08PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 04-Mar-2002 Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > This one fixes Michael Schmitt's 'no hook' bug in copy/pasting enumerates. > > The idea is good the realization not. I looked into the patch and it seems > something strange to me, d

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 04-Mar-2002 Martin Vermeer wrote: >> This one fixes Michael Schmitt's 'no hook' bug in copy/pasting >> enumerates. Juergen> The idea is good the realization not. I looked into the patch Juergen> and it seems something stra

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:49:54PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Monday 04 March 2002 2:23 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > BTW the other patch did fix something: having the '^' symbol in a way > > that can be saved and loaded and rendered in LaTeX. No, it was not a > > crasher. And yes, the re

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 04 March 2002 2:23 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: > BTW the other patch did fix something: having the '^' symbol in a way > that can be saved and loaded and rendered in LaTeX. No, it was not a > crasher. And yes, the rest was UI tinkering. Sorry! I don't think you need be too apologetic. It

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 04-Mar-2002 Martin Vermeer wrote: > This one fixes Michael Schmitt's 'no hook' bug in copy/pasting enumerates. The idea is good the realization not. I looked into the patch and it seems something strange to me, does it really work? Anyway I don't think we like this solution. If noone else,

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:52:44PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> And what bug# did this fix? > > > | None. Guess I've just got used to submitting patches recently. Apologies. > > Very well. > > I want all patches that we apply to fix a problem. (and not even any > problem, it must be a

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Monday 04 March 2002 12:18 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Sunday 03 March 2002 9:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: >> >> Here is a patch to provide the characters Å(ngström), Ø(rsted), >> >> ^, _ a

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 04 March 2002 12:18 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Sunday 03 March 2002 9:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> Here is a patch to provide the characters Å(ngström), Ø(rsted), > >> ^, _ and the roman math T (for Transpose) in the math mi

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sunday 03 March 2002 9:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: >> Here is a patch to provide the characters Å(ngström), Ø(rsted), >> ^, _ and the roman math T (for Transpose) in the math misc >> panel. > | Applied. And what bug# did this fix? -- Lg

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Sunday 03 March 2002 9:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Here is a patch to provide the characters Å(ngström), Ø(rsted), > ^, _ and the roman math T (for Transpose) in the math misc > panel. Applied. A

Re: Some special units and symbols

2002-03-03 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 11:01:59PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Å and Ø are the only physical units that may be troublesome to > > ... > > ^ is our old troublemaker; I see no other way of getting it to can't this wait ? We've finally got down to a reasonable number of 1.2.0 bugs. I know this

Some special units and symbols

2002-03-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
Here is a patch to provide the characters Å(ngström), Ø(rsted), ^, _ and the roman math T (for Transpose) in the math misc panel. Å and Ø are the only physical units that may be troublesome to generate on a non-scandinavian keyboard. Also they should be in roman, being units. This is done auto