Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> sorted.
|
| Lars> sorting function and locale decides sorting order.
|
| I stand corrected, then.
|
| So, lars, would you be OK with replacing "sort -f -n" with a plain
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:56:17PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Why? Can't this be used as instead of the 'sort | uniq' you
> Andre> need?
>
> This is a command used in a makefile. If we write a C++ program
> everytime someone has to think more than 30 seconds about a shell command,
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:42:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: This could be solved in twelve lines or so in any
Andre> language that has "map"
>> Which is irrelevant to our problem, probably but...
Andre> Why? Can't
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> sorted.
Lars> sorting function and locale decides sorting order.
I stand corrected, then.
So, lars, would you be OK with replacing "sort -f -n" with a plain
"sort"? I do not understand why you used "-n" actually.
JMarc
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:42:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> This could be solved in twelve lines or so in any language that
> Andre> has "map"
>
> Which is irrelevant to our problem, probably but...
Why? Can't this be used as instead of the 'sort | uniq' you need?
> Andre> set
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Andre> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:05:05PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
| Andre> wrote: Do they need to be sorted at all?
| >> Yes, probably, so that we can uniquify the list.
|
| And
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:05:05PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Do they need to be sorted at all?
>> Yes, probably, so that we can uniquify the list.
Andre> This could be solved in twelve lines or so in any language t
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:05:05PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Do they need to be sorted at all?
>
> Yes, probably, so that we can uniquify the list.
This could be solved in twelve lines or so in any language that has "map"
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
set
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> So what should we do? Maybe remove the options altogether and use a
>> plain "sort"? Would that give the same result for everybody?
Andre> Do they need
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So what should we do? Maybe remove the options altogether and use a
> plain "sort"? Would that give the same result for everybody?
Do they need to be sorted at all?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to
As Michael S pointed out, po/POTFILES.in gets updated every other
commit just because the sort command has different semantics on
different systems. This is a pain because it affects the po files too.
Why is that? The current command used to sort is "sort -f -n", where
-f is to ignore case and -n
11 matches
Mail list logo
