Am Montag, 3. April 2006 03:37 schrieb Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001:
I was just wondering if there's some reason why we can't include these
steps
in the various auto* files?
The only reason is that nobody did it so far. If you submit a patch that
does not break the other platforms I can out
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Am Montag, 3. April 2006 03:37 schrieb Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001:
| I was just wondering if there's some reason why we can't include these
| steps
| in the various auto* files?
|
| The only reason is that nobody did it so far. If you submit a patch
Am Montag, 3. April 2006 03:37 schrieb Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001:
> I was just wondering if there's some reason why we can't include these
steps
> in the various auto* files?
The only reason is that nobody did it so far. If you submit a patch that
does not break the other platforms I can
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Montag, 3. April 2006 03:37 schrieb Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001:
| > I was just wondering if there's some reason why we can't include these
| steps
| > in the various auto* files?
|
| The only reason is that nobody did it so far. If you submit a
Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bo 1. my session patch. All features work fine, including remembering
Bo of windows size/position, save/load bookmarks, lastfiles, restore
Bo cursor to saved document locations, open files from last session
Bo .The only thing missing is the GUI
Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001 wrote:
I was just wondering if there's some reason why we can't include these steps
in the various auto* files? This recipe changes fairly often while greatly
appreciated is a bit of a hassle to keep up with.
Most steps are already covered by Angus' build
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> 1. my session patch. All features work fine, including remembering
Bo> of windows size/position, save/load bookmarks, lastfiles, restore
Bo> cursor to saved document locations, open files from last session
Bo> .The only thing missing is
Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001 wrote:
I was just wondering if there's some reason why we can't include these steps
in the various auto* files? This recipe changes fairly often & while greatly
appreciated is a bit of a hassle to keep up with.
Most steps are already covered by Angus' build
Bo Peng wrote:
Why didn't do it a few days earlier? :-)
I sent them a couple of times in the past.
Michael
Bo Peng wrote:
But not to INSTALL.Win32? We should try to keep that thing in sync.
Well, we (try to) do so. However, INSTALL.Win32 passes responsibility to
two build scripts for compiling the aspell and lyx sources.
Moreover, INSTALL.Win32 and Angus' scripts rely on a shared qtwin
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
[...]
5. Aspell
[...]
5.4 Edit files
[...]
./modules/speller/language.cpp:
Isn't this ./modules/speller/default/language.cpp ?
--
Enrico
I was just wondering if there's some reason why we can't include these steps
in the various auto* files? This recipe changes fairly often while greatly
appreciated is a bit of a hassle to keep up with.
cheers,
andrew
export LDFLAGS=-L/home/user/qt-3/lib -lqtmain -lqt-mt -lopengl32
Bo Peng wrote:
Why didn't do it a few days earlier? :-)
I sent them a couple of times in the past.
Michael
Bo Peng wrote:
But not to INSTALL.Win32? We should try to keep that thing in sync.
Well, we (try to) do so. However, INSTALL.Win32 passes responsibility to
two build scripts for compiling the aspell and lyx sources.
Moreover, INSTALL.Win32 and Angus' scripts rely on a shared qtwin
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
[...]
> 5. Aspell
[...]
> 5.4 Edit files
[...]
> ./modules/speller/language.cpp:
Isn't this ./modules/speller/default/language.cpp ?
--
Enrico
I was just wondering if there's some reason why we can't include these steps
in the various auto* files? This recipe changes fairly often & while greatly
appreciated is a bit of a hassle to keep up with.
cheers,
andrew
export LDFLAGS="-L/home/user/qt-3/lib -lqtmain -lqt-mt -lopengl32
Bo Peng wrote:
1. my session patch. All features work fine, including remembering of
windows size/position, save/load bookmarks, lastfiles, restore cursor
to saved document locations, open files from last session .The
only thing missing is the GUI support for the new rc entries.
2. local
3 should definitely go into 1.4.1. 1 and 2 are enhancements. The can
only be regarded for 1.4.1 if the patches are not too large, I guess.
2 is small, but it is a bit intrusive.
NO! It is not painful! I will re-send my updated compile instructions
later today.
Why didn't do it a few days
Bo Peng wrote:
1. my session patch. All features work fine, including remembering of
windows size/position, save/load bookmarks, lastfiles, restore cursor
to saved document locations, open files from last session .The
only thing missing is the GUI support for the new rc entries.
2. local
> 3 should definitely go into 1.4.1. 1 and 2 are enhancements. The can
> only be regarded for 1.4.1 if the patches are not too large, I guess.
2 is small, but it is a bit intrusive.
> NO! It is not painful! I will re-send my updated compile instructions
> later today.
Why didn't do it a few
Dear list,
After a full days struggling, I finally have lyx1.5svn running under
windows (with no aspell support). I applied and tested the following
patches:
1. my session patch. All features work fine, including remembering of
windows size/position, save/load bookmarks, lastfiles, restore
1. my session patch. All features work fine, including remembering of
I forgot to mention that this patch needs a
#include boost/tuple/tuple.hpp
in src/session.h to work under windows. Linux/gcc is somehow less
strict on the headers.
Cheers,
Bo
Dear list,
After a full days struggling, I finally have lyx1.5svn running under
windows (with no aspell support). I applied and tested the following
patches:
1. my session patch. All features work fine, including remembering of
windows size/position, save/load bookmarks, lastfiles, restore
> 1. my session patch. All features work fine, including remembering of
I forgot to mention that this patch needs a
#include
in src/session.h to work under windows. Linux/gcc is somehow less
strict on the headers.
Cheers,
Bo
24 matches
Mail list logo
