Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this patch in 1.4.2. What about the attached? Jürgen Index: src/paragraph.h === --- src/paragraph.h (Revision 13648) +++ src/paragraph.h

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this patch in 1.4.2. Juergen What about the attached? It looks OK to me, except - void cleanChanges(); + void

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this | patch in 1.4.2. | | What about the attached? | | Jürgen | | Index: src/paragraph.h |

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars I am still looking at those enum names. Lars I have a strong dislike for cryptic abbreviations. Lars trackingOn, trackingOff, trackingUnknown would suit me better I Lars think. There is also Changes::On/Off/Unknown (which is much more

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars I am still looking at those enum names. | | Lars I have a strong dislike for cryptic abbreviations. | | Lars trackingOn, trackingOff, trackingUnknown would suit me better I | Lars

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I am still looking at those enum names. I have a strong dislike for cryptic abbreviations. trackingOn, trackingOff, trackingUnknown would suit me better I think. Fine with me. Can I apply the attached? Jürgen Index: src/paragraph.h

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I am still looking at those enum names. I have a strong dislike for cryptic abbreviations. trackingOn, trackingOff, trackingUnknown would suit me better I think. Juergen Fine with me. Can I

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Juergen Fine with me. Can I apply the attached? OK for me. I'll apply to branch and trunk then. Jürgen

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this > patch in 1.4.2. What about the attached? Jürgen Index: src/paragraph.h === --- src/paragraph.h (Revision 13648) +++ src/paragraph.h

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this >> patch in 1.4.2. Juergen> What about the attached? It looks OK to me, except - void cleanChanges(); +

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | > Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this | > patch in 1.4.2. | | What about the attached? | | Jürgen | | Index: src/paragraph.h |

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I am still looking at those enum names. Lars> I have a strong dislike for cryptic abbreviations. Lars> trackingOn, trackingOff, trackingUnknown would suit me better I Lars> think. There is also Changes::On/Off/Unknown (which

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> I am still looking at those enum names. | | Lars> I have a strong dislike for cryptic abbreviations. | | Lars> trackingOn, trackingOff, trackingUnknown would suit me

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I am still looking at those enum names. > > I have a strong dislike for cryptic abbreviations. > > trackingOn, trackingOff, trackingUnknown would suit me better I think. Fine with me. Can I apply the attached? Jürgen Index: src/paragraph.h

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> I am still looking at those enum names. >> >> I have a strong dislike for cryptic abbreviations. >> >> trackingOn, trackingOff, trackingUnknown would suit me better I >> think. Juergen>

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen> Fine with me. Can I apply the attached? > > OK for me. I'll apply to branch and trunk then. Jürgen

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: | | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | Well, I do not like much passing an undocumented int to a function... | What do the different values mean? | | 0: ct status on in this buffer | 1: ct status off in this buffer | -1: ct

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars And please use all caps only for macros. Huh? Most of our enums are like that, I think. JMarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars And please use all caps only for macros. Huh? Most of our enums are like that, I think. Indeed. But development/Code_rules/Rules tells not to use all caps. I forgot that, because it is actually not

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen 0: ct status on in this buffer 1: ct status off in this Juergen buffer -1: ct status unknown in this buffer Juergen the value is only important on paste, because then we have to Juergen differentiate the ct status of the buffer

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars And please use all caps only for macros. | | Huh? Most of our enums are like that, I think. I know... and we should change them. -- Lgb

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Bo How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and Bo it's been tested under linux/windows. Georg, what would you advise?

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Bennett Helm wrote: On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Bo How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and Bo it's been tested under linux/windows. Georg,

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: | | > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | >> Well, I do not like much passing an undocumented int to a function... | >> What do the different values mean? | > | > 0: ct status "on" in this buffer | > 1: ct status "off" in this

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> And please use all caps only for macros. Huh? Most of our enums are like that, I think. JMarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> And please use all caps only for macros. > > Huh? Most of our enums are like that, I think. Indeed. But development/Code_rules/Rules tells not to use all caps. I forgot that, because

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> 0: ct status "on" in this buffer 1: ct status "off" in this Juergen> buffer -1: ct status "unknown" in this buffer Juergen> the value is only important on paste, because then we have to Juergen> differentiate the ct

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> And please use all caps only for macros. | | Huh? Most of our enums are like that, I think. I know... and we should change them. -- Lgb

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Bo> How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and Bo> it's been tested under linux/windows. Georg, what would you

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Bennett Helm wrote: > On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> > What else is urgent for 1.4.1? >>> Bo> How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward >>> and >>> Bo>

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Well, I do not like much passing an undocumented int to a function... What do the different values mean? 0: ct status on in this buffer 1: ct status off in this buffer -1: ct status unknown in this buffer the value is only important on paste, because then we have to

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: 0: ct status on in this buffer 1: ct status off in this buffer those have to be swapped of course. Jürgen

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Well, I do not like much passing an undocumented int to a function... What do the different values mean? 0: ct status on in this buffer 1: ct status off in this buffer -1: ct status unknown in this buffer If you change these to an

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Well, I do not like much passing an undocumented int to a function... > What do the different values mean? 0: ct status "on" in this buffer 1: ct status "off" in this buffer -1: ct status "unknown" in this buffer the value is only important on paste, because then we

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > 0: ct status "on" in this buffer > 1: ct status "off" in this buffer those have to be swapped of course. Jürgen

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Well, I do not like much passing an undocumented int to a function... >> What do the different values mean? > > 0: ct status "on" in this buffer > 1: ct status "off" in this buffer > -1: ct status "unknown" in this buffer If you

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jose' Is this reasonable? Jose' For docbook users who have used previously an SGML Jose' paragraph a fix is planned for 1.4.2. Yes, put something like that in RELEASE_NOTES, with a bug number if you have one. JMarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Uwe == Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Uwe It adds the fancybox package and describes it. This is simple and Uwe should go into 1.4.1. Indeed. I did that. Jmarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:10 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? I think Juergen's patch for change tracking (inserting a cut

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Bo How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and Bo it's been tested under linux/windows. Georg, what would you advise? Bo If you are willing to consider, I can submit a newer version of my Bo local

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? Martin's patch to fix the math crashes and bug 2485 should go into 1.4.1. A good patch for the cursor regression (bug 686) would be a nice thing to have, if available soon. Joost

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Bo How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and Bo it's been tested under linux/windows. Georg, what would you advise? Bennet reported a crash in insetbibtex when

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 10:58 +0200, Joost Verburg wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? Martin's patch to fix the math crashes and bug 2485 should go into 1.4.1. It should first go into 1.5... is everybody happy with it? - Martin signature.asc Description:

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Martin Vermeer wrote: It should first go into 1.5... is everybody happy with it? It works fine for me. Joost

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin I think Juergen's patch for change tracking (inserting a cut Martin from a change tracked doc into a non- change tracked doc, Martin saving and loading) should be included, as it allows the Martin creation of un-loadable documents (crash

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 10:58 +0200, Joost Verburg wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? Martin's patch to fix the math crashes and bug 2485 should go into 1.4.1. Martin It should first go into 1.5... is

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

This one is definitely not going in 1.4.1, if only because it has not been applied to 1.5 yet. And what we are looking for in 1.4.1 is not adding plenty of new features, but fixing regressions or bad bugs. OK. Bo

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

A good patch for the cursor regression (bug 686) would be a nice thing to have, if available soon. Yes. It is available now. A bit more complicated than I expected since I find that pullArg is not the right function to use for these cases. Please check out the patch from bug686 and test. Bo

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Bo How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and Bo it's been tested under linux/windows. Georg, what would you advise?

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose'> Is this reasonable? Jose'> """ For docbook users who have used previously an SGML Jose'> paragraph a fix is planned for 1.4.2. """ Yes, put something like that in RELEASE_NOTES, with a bug number if you have one. JMarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Uwe> It adds the fancybox package and describes it. This is simple and Uwe> should go into 1.4.1. Indeed. I did that. Jmarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:10 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? > > There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message > about beamer.layout not working? > > What else is urgent for 1.4.1? I think Juergen's patch for change tracking (inserting a

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Bo> How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and Bo> it's been tested under linux/windows. Georg, what would you advise? Bo> If you are willing to consider, I can submit a newer version of

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? Martin's patch to fix the math crashes and bug 2485 should go into 1.4.1. A good patch for the cursor regression (bug 686) would be a nice thing to have, if available soon. Joost

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: > >>> What else is urgent for 1.4.1? > Bo> How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and > Bo> it's been tested under linux/windows. > > Georg, what would you advise? Bennet reported a

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 10:58 +0200, Joost Verburg wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? > > Martin's patch to fix the math crashes and bug 2485 should go into 1.4.1. It should first go into 1.5... is everybody happy with it? - Martin signature.asc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Martin Vermeer wrote: It should first go into 1.5... is everybody happy with it? It works fine for me. Joost

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> I think Juergen's patch for change tracking (inserting a cut Martin> from a change tracked doc into a non- change tracked doc, Martin> saving and loading) should be included, as it allows the Martin> creation of un-loadable

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 10:58 +0200, Joost Verburg wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? >> >> Martin's patch to fix the math crashes and bug 2485 should go into >> 1.4.1. Martin> It should

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> This one is definitely not going in 1.4.1, if only because it has not > been applied to 1.5 yet. And what we are looking for in 1.4.1 is not > adding plenty of new features, but fixing regressions or bad bugs. OK. Bo

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> A good patch for the cursor regression (bug 686) would be a nice thing > to have, if available soon. Yes. It is available now. A bit more complicated than I expected since I find that pullArg is not the right function to use for these cases. Please check out the patch from bug686 and test. Bo

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Bo> How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and Bo> it's been tested under linux/windows. Georg, what would you

Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? JMarc -*- text -*- This file describes what has been done in the preparation of LyX 1.4.1 All comments are welcome. I'd be glad

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? What about spellchecking -- http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bennett What about spellchecking -- Bennett http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi? id=2218? Martin, how ready is the patch? JMarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? I did, but have not yet had time to look after it. Bo, can you please send a minimal example document? What else is urgent for

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? - Document the packages prettyref, varioref and preview in LaTeXConfig.lyx. JMarc, have you seen my patch for http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2469 It adds the fancybox package and describes it. This is simple and

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:10:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? IMO, the patch recently applied to trunk, fixing bug

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:50 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bennett What about spellchecking -- Bennett http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi? id=2218? Martin, how ready is the patch? Grmpf. The patch works allright, but the whole

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin Grmpf. The patch works allright, but the whole exitEarly_ Martin situation is a mess. Yes, it is ugly. Martin But I suppose the patch improves things and should be applied Martin for 1.4. I think I'll keep it for 1.4.2. JMarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? Georg I did, but have not yet had time to look after it. Bo, can you Georg

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Shall I add numarticle.layout to stdsections.inc as we discussed? Yes please. What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Georg Nothing IMO. There are a couple of annoying newly discovered Georg bugs (like math crashes or 2476), but I think we have collected Georg enough

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? My updateCounter patch might be a good candidate. The former version was tested by Martin and me.

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Enrico IMO, the patch recently applied to trunk, fixing bug 2344 and Enrico cygwin related path problems. I rewrote that patch such that Enrico to not change the current semantics and to comply with the Enrico request about the internal path

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg I forgot: Enricos path cleanup should also go in. It is a noop Georg on mac and unix, and can only improve things on windows. I did it. Georg When do you plan to release? If I cannot do it tomorrow, it will be monday. Is that OK? Georg

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:45:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Enrico IMO, the patch recently applied to trunk, fixing bug 2344 and Enrico cygwin related path problems. I rewrote that patch such that Enrico to not change the

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? There are some changes that I need to do for docbook support

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

What else is urgent for 1.4.1? How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and it's been tested under linux/windows. If you are willing to consider, I can submit a newer version of my local .layout patch that allows users to open .lyx directly with local .layout, .cls files

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Well, we still have these patches: r13432 - MV - Selective expose patch r13520 - GB - Fix bug 2107 r13532 - GB - Adjust keybord shortcut of the latex format to the changed name (this belongs to the fix for bug 2107)

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:58:49PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Well, we still have these patches: r13432 - MV - Selective expose patch ... I don't know what r13432 is good for. Ah yes... it makes X11 expose events

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Martin Vermeer wrote: Ah yes... it makes X11 expose events selective in the sense, that only the paragraphs on the screen that have changed are exposed, using the info in the ViewMetricsInfo. There was no empirical evidence that it makes things faster on any platform, but... Doesn't look

Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? JMarc -*- text -*- This file describes what has been done in the preparation of LyX 1.4.1 All comments are welcome. I'd be glad

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? What about spellchecking --

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> What about spellchecking -- Bennett> ? Martin, how ready is the patch? JMarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? > > There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message > about beamer.layout not working? I did, but have not yet had time to look after it. Bo, can you please send a minimal example document? > What else is urgent

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? > - Document the packages prettyref, varioref and preview in > LaTeXConfig.lyx. JMarc, have you seen my patch for http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2469 It adds the fancybox package and describes it. This is simple and

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:10:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? > > There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message > about beamer.layout not working? > > What else is urgent for 1.4.1? IMO, the patch recently applied to trunk,

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:50 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bennett> What about spellchecking -- > Bennett> ? > > Martin, how ready is the patch? Grmpf. The patch works allright,

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Grmpf. The patch works allright, but the whole exitEarly_ Martin> situation is a mess. Yes, it is ugly. Martin> But I suppose the patch improves things and should be applied Martin> for 1.4. I think I'll keep it for 1.4.2.

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? >> >> There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message >> about beamer.layout not working? Georg> I did, but have not yet had time to look after it.

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Shall I add numarticle.layout to stdsections.inc as we discussed? Yes please. >>> What else is urgent for 1.4.1? > > Georg> Nothing IMO. There are a couple of annoying newly discovered > Georg> bugs (like math crashes or 2476), but I think we have collected >

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message about beamer.layout not working? What else is urgent for 1.4.1? My updateCounter patch might be a good candidate. The former version was tested by Martin and me.

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> IMO, the patch recently applied to trunk, fixing bug 2344 and Enrico> cygwin related path problems. I rewrote that patch such that Enrico> to not change the current semantics and to comply with the Enrico> request about the

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> I forgot: Enricos path cleanup should also go in. It is a noop Georg> on mac and unix, and can only improve things on windows. I did it. Georg> When do you plan to release? >> If I cannot do it tomorrow, it will be monday. Is that

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:45:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> IMO, the patch recently applied to trunk, fixing bug 2344 and > Enrico> cygwin related path problems. I rewrote that patch such that > Enrico> to not

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So what is needed for 1.4.1 now? > > There is the layout2layout patch. Georg, did you see Bo's message > about beamer.layout not working? > > What else is urgent for 1.4.1? There are some changes that I need to do for docbook

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

> What else is urgent for 1.4.1? How about 2186? The patch (r13540 at 1.5.x) is straightforward and it's been tested under linux/windows. If you are willing to consider, I can submit a newer version of my local .layout patch that allows users to open .lyx directly with local .layout, .cls files

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What else is urgent for 1.4.1? Well, we still have these patches: r13432 - MV - Selective expose patch r13520 - GB - Fix bug 2107 r13532 - GB - Adjust keybord shortcut of the "latex" format to the changed name (this belongs to the fix for bug 2107)

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:58:49PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > >What else is urgent for 1.4.1? > > > > > Well, we still have these patches: > > r13432 - MV - Selective expose patch ... > I don't know what r13432 is good for. Ah yes... it makes X11 "expose"

Re: Towards LyX 1.4.1 [status update #2]

Martin Vermeer wrote: Ah yes... it makes X11 "expose" events selective in the sense, that only the paragraphs on the screen that have changed are exposed, using the info in the ViewMetricsInfo. There was no empirical evidence that it makes things faster on any platform, but... Doesn't look

  1   2   >