Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I've created a personal wiki page in trac that displays all the tables and
> bug in which I'm interested or which I want to trace.
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/HomeVfr
nice, i cloned this page for the generic bug home:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHom
Hi all,
I've created a personal wiki page in trac that displays all the tables
and bug in which I'm interested or which I want to trace.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/HomeVfr
In this way, you can pretty quickly see you presonal queries.
Vincent
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> You can reassign a bug to another developer. However, this might convey a
> slightly different message than 'to make someone aware' of the bug ;-).
Indeed. At it's a pretty harsh way to ask for help.
Jürgen
>Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Have a quick look again and look for glaring mistakes and
>> showstoppers, and I'll enable editing/modification of the track
>> tickets later today.(first only for authenticated users, later
>> for anon as well.)
>
> Being logged in, I realize that I can only add m
On 2009-04-02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:12, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> > 'my tickets' isnt for you as reporter?
>> Most probably not, as it returned an empty list for me.
> You are probably noted down as "anonymous" so I wouldn't be surprised by
> that.
In bugzilla, I
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Have a quick look again and look for glaring mistakes and showstoppers,
> and I'll enable editing/modification of the track tickets later today.
> (first only for authenticated users, later for anon as well.)
Being logged in, I realize that I can only add myself to CC
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
>
> >> On 2009-04-01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> > Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >>
> >> > 'my tickets' isnt for you as reporter?
> >>
> >> Most probably not, as it returned an empty list for me.
>> On 2009-04-01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> > Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>>
>> > 'my tickets' isnt for you as reporter?
>>
>> Most probably not, as it returned an empty list for me.
>>
>
>You are probably noted down as "anonymous" so I wouldn't be surprised by that.
>
>
>--
> Lgb
>
I
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:12, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-04-01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> > 'my tickets' isnt for you as reporter?
>
> Most probably not, as it returned an empty list for me.
>
You are probably noted down as "anonymous" so I wouldn't be su
On 2009-04-01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> 'my tickets' isnt for you as reporter?
Most probably not, as it returned an empty list for me.
Günter
I also couldn't make a query to find all bugs that have me either as a
CC or as the reporter.
'my tickets' isnt for you as reporter?
pavel
I can probably make a query to find all bugs that have me as a cc, and a
query to find all bugs that I reported, but I couldn't find a way to
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> >maybe we can make our own list of useful report.
>
> I'd guess that if you are a registered user and you're logged in, you'll
> have your own wiki-page...
nevertheless i think its good to have customized our new bug tracking welcome
screen.
> >* Day old
>maybe we can make our own list of useful report.
I'd guess that if you are a registered user and you're logged in, you'll
have your own wiki-page...
>from the current page maybe only
>
>* 'Active Tickets'
>* 'My Tickets'
>
>and then new ones:
>* Branch Target
* 1.6.x target
>* Trunk Targe
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> > This page explains how you can easily add queries to the trac wiki
> > pages..
> >
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/TracQuery
>
> I also think they should go to the reports page (or we should disable that
> page, since the av
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> I'm not at it in any way ;-)...
>
> Or weren't you asking me ?
more a general "you" (everyone who feels addressed).
Jürgen
If they were renumbered in a consistent way, I could do it with a
little bit of PHP code I guess. Is it consistent?
AFAICS, there is a comment added for each change to the bug, so I
presume that numbering is
different.
JMarc
>Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
>> This page explains how you can easily add queries to the trac wiki
>> pages..
>>
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/TracQuery
>
>I also think they should go to the reports page (or we should disable
>that page, since the available reports do not strike me v
How are requests to TRAC redirected? I can't figure out _how_
http://www.lyx.org/trac correctly translated to the right CGI.
It should be in www.lyx.org.conf, but I don't see it...
It can be in a local .htaccess file, too.
JMarc
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> This page explains how you can easily add queries to the trac wiki
> pages..
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/TracQuery
I also think they should go to the reports page (or we should disable that
page, since the available reports do not strike me very useful
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
this is not directly related to trac itself but - would it be possible
to setup bugzilla.lyx.org in the way that
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449 redirects into
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/449
Yes, I believe this is possible with U
>yes this mimic the old behaviour quite well.
>would it be possible to add this link into the
>reports page http://www.lyx.org/trac/report ?
This page explains how you can easily add queries to the trac wiki
pages..
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/TracQuery
> pavel
Vincent
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> >> Why is a query more comfortable thatn a single click on timeline?
> >
> >for 2 reasons:
> >1) there are no duplicates
> >2) the bugs are ordered by their numbers
> >
> >> Have you looked at it?
> >
> >yes, i did. i found the table bugzilla gave us for bu
>> Why is a query more comfortable thatn a single click on timeline?
>
>for 2 reasons:
>1) there are no duplicates
>2) the bugs are ordered by their numbers
>
>> Have you looked at it?
>
>yes, i did. i found the table bugzilla gave us for bugs changed in
>last day/week/month helpful.
>
>pavel
>
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> > > Wouldnt' just looking at the timeline work?
> >
> > better than nothing if it works, but it won't be much comfortable.
> > isn't possible somehow to allow adding filter for time of change
> > in the custom queries?
> >
>
> Why is a query more comfortable thatn a s
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 13:01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 22:09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > > Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> > > > The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the
> result.
> > >
> > > i was not able to find how to r
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 22:09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> > > The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
> >
> > i was not able to find how to run the custom query dependent on the time of
> > change.
> > when
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 08:10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Wouldnt' just looking at the timeline work?
>
> Currently, the timeline only shows changes to tickets that were opened or
> closed. I think it would be good to enable ticket_show_details in trac.ini,
> i.e. "E
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Wouldnt' just looking at the timeline work?
Currently, the timeline only shows changes to tickets that were opened or
closed. I think it would be good to enable ticket_show_details in trac.ini,
i.e. "Enable the display of all ticket changes in the timeline, not only
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 00:44, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
>
> There are still some missing configuration that can be done, and I have not
> setup any
> authorization or authentication yet.
>
I just did (in progress) anothe
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 22:09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> > The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
>
> i was not able to find how to run the custom query dependent on the time of
> change.
> when i want to see the all the bugs edited during
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 16:14, Christian Ridderström <
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
>>
>>> The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
>>>
>>
>> this is not directly related to trac it
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
i was not able to find how to run the custom query dependent on the time of
change.
when i want to see the all the bugs edited during last 24 hours what should i
do?
pavel
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Christian Ridderström writes:
Yes, I believe this is possible with URI rewriting. I could do it if
Lars' redirects the domain bugzilla.lyx.org to lyx.lyx.org.
What may be more complicated is
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449#c4
sinc
Christian Ridderström writes:
> Yes, I believe this is possible with URI rewriting. I could do it if
> Lars' redirects the domain bugzilla.lyx.org to lyx.lyx.org.
What may be more complicated is
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449#c4
since it seems that comments got renumbered.
JMarc
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
this is not directly related to trac itself but - would it be possible
to setup bugzilla.lyx.org in the way that
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
this is not directly related to trac itself but - would it be possible
to setup bugzilla.lyx.org in the way that
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449
redirects into
http://www.lyx.org/trac
>>
>>> I'm looking at e.g.
>>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=status&USER=anonymous
>>>
>>> and I wonder if anyone else thinks it's a bit slow?
>>
>> We just have t many active bugs.. +- 1000 !?
>
>Didn't you say you were running out of bugs ;-)
>
>/C
>
Yes, I did.
Vincent
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
I'm looking at e.g.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=status&USER=anonymous
and I wonder if anyone else thinks it's a bit slow?
We just have t many active bugs.. +- 1000 !?
Didn't you say you were running out o
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:56, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
What is wrong with "defect"?
Nothing. I just didn't get the concept (I thought it means the entry is
defect). See my other mail.
As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbra
>I'm looking at e.g.
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=status&USER=anonymous
>
>and I wonder if anyone else thinks it's a bit slow?
We just have t many active bugs.. +- 1000 !?
>Or perhaps even more constructive, to discuss when/where the
>next LyX meeting should be held?
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
I'm looking at e.g.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=status&USER=anonymous
and I wonder if anyone else thinks it's a bit slow?
For instance, clicking on
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:53, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
> > I think this issue is fixed now also the keyword issue, so in 30
> mins (or so), please check again.
>
> Things look pretty good now.. I can't think of any problems right now.
>
> I'm curious
> I think this issue is fixed now also the keyword issue, so in 30 mins (or
> so), please check again.
Things look pretty good now.. I can't think of any problems right now.
I'm curious what personalization features trac offers when I can login.
And I didn't find a way how to enter a ne
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> now also the keyword issue, so in 30 mins (or
> so), please check again.
Looks like it, yes.
(though I haven't checked the quantity)
Thanks,
Jürgen
2009/3/30 Lars Gullik Bjønnes
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
> v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
>
>> > You could have tried yourself you know...
>>
>> Well, I couldn't find another bug with attachments very quickly and I had
>> to do something else.
>>
>>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
> > You could have tried yourself you know...
>
> Well, I couldn't find another bug with attachments very quickly and I had
> to do something else.
>
> > My guess it is a size issue, and I am only
> You could have tried yourself you know...
Well, I couldn't find another bug with attachments very quickly and I had to do
something else.
> My guess it is a size issue, and I am only guessing since you give no info
> about what you tried to do.
What I tried to do.. ? Uhh.. Download th
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:30, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> This is just a textual representation of the change in bugzilla.
>> But I think I might fix this without too much effort.
>>
>> Are there other showstoppers?
>>
>
> The attachment of bug 52
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is just a textual representation of the change in bugzilla.
> But I think I might fix this without too much effort.
Also for the other keywords?
> Are there other showstoppers?
None that I'm aware of. However, I'm eager to see the possibilities we have
when we
This is just a textual representation of the change in bugzilla.
But I think I might fix this without too much effort.
Are there other showstoppers?
The attachment of bug 5238 can't be retrieved...
How about the other attachments..?
Vinc
> >I see 42 tickets that match on "fixedinbranch" and 206 that matches
> >"fixedintrunk", IMHO not out of the question to do this manually.
> >
>
> But in the bugs themselves trac says:
>
> "keywords fixedinbranch added"
>
> They just don't show up in the column view or in search queries..
>
This
> > As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbranch, that is something we made up,
> > noone else uses bugzilla that way (afaics)
>
> But trac also has keywords. What stops us from simply migrating this data?
>
> So is this a showstopper?
>
>> IMHO yes. And we need to restore this in any case. Our current re
Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
> As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbranch, that is something we made up, noone else
> uses bugzilla that way (afaics)
I can believe that. But we can do it nevertheless, can't we? Or can we
set it as fixed in some milestone and have the bug appears as long as
the milestone is
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:56, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > What is wrong with "defect"?
>
> Nothing. I just didn't get the concept (I thought it means the entry is
> defect). See my other mail.
>
> > As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbranch, that is something we made up, n
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What is wrong with "defect"?
Nothing. I just didn't get the concept (I thought it means the entry is
defect). See my other mail.
> As to fixedintrunk, fixedinbranch, that is something we made up, noone else
> uses bugzilla that way (afaics)
But trac also has keyword
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:32, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I guess you noticed the large number of "defect" Type entries.
>
> OK, I see now that this seems to be intentional. Trac distinguishes ticket
> type ("enhancements" and "defects") from Severity. Having the Se
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:17, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
>
> I guess you noticed the large number of "defect" Type entries. Furthermore,
> the "fixedinbranch" and "fixedintrunk" keywords seems
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I guess you noticed the large number of "defect" Type entries.
OK, I see now that this seems to be intentional. Trac distinguishes ticket
type ("enhancements" and "defects") from Severity. Having the Severity
(perhaps instead of the unused Priority) in the table/summa
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
I guess you noticed the large number of "defect" Type entries. Furthermore,
the "fixedinbranch" and "fixedintrunk" keywords seems to have got lost on
transformation. This is crucial.
Jürgen
The full conversion is done, I'd like you to have a look at the result.
There are still some missing configuration that can be done, and I have not
setup any
authorization or authentication yet.
--
Lgb
60 matches
Mail list logo
