Re: Using super key in local binds

2013-01-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 26/01/2013 05:37, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> Currently, the super key is equivalent to alt for me on Ubuntu. I'm >> guessing that this is true because Mac does not have a super key? >> Thus, it would not make sense to have bindi

Re: Using super key in local binds

2013-01-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 26/01/2013 05:37, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Currently, the super key is equivalent to alt for me on Ubuntu. I'm guessing that this is true because Mac does not have a super key? Thus, it would not make sense to have bindings that cannot be used by Macs. Mac has a lot of keys too. I think thi

Re: Using super key in local binds

2013-01-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Currently, the super key is equivalent to alt for me on Ubuntu. I'm > guessing that this is true because Mac does not have a super key? > Thus, it would not make sense to have bindings that cannot be used by > Macs. Is this reasoning corr

Using super key in local binds

2013-01-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Currently, the super key is equivalent to alt for me on Ubuntu. I'm guessing that this is true because Mac does not have a super key? Thus, it would not make sense to have bindings that cannot be used by Macs. However, I think that it would still be nice to be able to use it for my local binds. It