On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > "Reuben" == Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> Reuben> As well as (or perhaps instead of) specifying page ranges, it
> Reuben> should be possible to give section
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 08:53:15AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Amir> wrote:
>> > "Reuben" == Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Reuben> As well as (or perhaps instead of) specifying page ranges, it
Reuben> should be poss
Commands affecting portions of your text keyed off LyX's understanding
of sections, subsections, etc.? *Very* cool.
Best regards
--
Larry S. Marso
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 12:59:31PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 08:53:15AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
amir added,
> As long as we're doing that, why not take it a step further. Using the TOC
> or some other method, allow the user to select portions of the document and
> do various operations. Spellcheck, Save as, Export (harder. Bug prone?) are
> just a few ideas.
Wouldn't being able to do this f
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 08:53:15AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Reuben" == Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Reuben> As well as (or perhaps instead of) specifying page ranges, it
> Reuben> should be possible to give section ranges.
>
> This would indeed be a nice thing
> "Reuben" == Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Reuben> As well as (or perhaps instead of) specifying page ranges, it
Reuben> should be possible to give section ranges.
This would indeed be a nice thing, and could be controled completely
from inside LyX. But I think there should be s
As well as (or perhaps instead of) specifying page ranges, it should be
possible to give section ranges.
--
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/rrt1001/ | maxim, n. wisdom for fools
