Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think I'd prefer something like
+x_ += theFontMetrics(font).width(str[0], str.size());
Going 'optically' through four layers is not adding clarity.
I
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think I'd prefer something like
+x_ += theFontMetrics(font).width([0], str.size());
Going 'optically' through four layers is not adding clarity.
I can
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think I'd prefer something like
+x_ += theFontMetrics(font).width(str[0], str.size());
Going 'optically' through four layers is not adding clarity.
I can also
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>
> >>I think I'd prefer something like
> >>
> >> +x_ += theFontMetrics(font).width([0], str.size());
> >>
> >>Going 'optically' through four layers is not adding clarity.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think I'd prefer something like
+x_ += theFontMetrics(font).width(str[0], str.size());
Going 'optically' through four layers is not adding clarity.
I can also provide this helper function if you want, no problem. But I
guess that's not
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think I'd prefer something like
+x_ += theFontMetrics(font).width([0], str.size());
Going 'optically' through four layers is not adding clarity.
I can also provide this helper function if you want, no problem. But I
guess that's not
