Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-07 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 15:50:04 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Maybe too much. Checking LaTeXConfig.lyx for aguplus.layout > > previously I had > > Found: yes, no > > now I have > > Found: yes, yes > > The second

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Maybe too much. Checking LaTeXConfig.lyx for aguplus.layout > previously I had > Found: yes, no > now I have > Found: yes, yes > The second yes is for agums.sty, but this is wrong, because not > installed here. I think

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-07 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 14:22:50 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 13:21:22 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > : > > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > > > case of MikTeX, >

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-07 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 13:21:22 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > > case of MikTeX, > > otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in > >

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > case of MikTeX, > otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in > 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, > or 'answers.sty' in

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-07 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2018 17:49:32 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 07/06/2018 04:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > > : > >> On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >>> Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-06 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/06/2018 04:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > : >> On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >> OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. > >> Since there are that many, maybe it

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >> OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. > >> Since there are that many, maybe it

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-05 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. >> Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle >> them when they become invalid :( > Or just handle

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. > Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle > them when they become invalid :( Or just handle them subsequently. > Changing dtk.layout now. This one

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-05 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 17:38:12 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Sounds reasonable. Will you do it? > > I don't mind if you beat me to it. > > > Also other some layouts? > > I think all layouts will need to be

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Sounds reasonable. Will you do it? I don't mind if you beat me to it. > Also other some layouts? I think all layouts will need to be audited. I've already handled some, but many are left. Jürgen > > Kornel

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-05 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 14:14:09 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-07-05 11:48 GMT+02:00 Kornel Benko : > > > The layout uses dtklogos.sty, but this is not provided by > > www.ctan.org/usergrps/dante/dtk.zip. > > Instead there is dtk-logos.sty. > > > > Shouldn't the line > > #

Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2018-07-05 11:48 GMT+02:00 Kornel Benko : > The layout uses dtklogos.sty, but this is not provided by > www.ctan.org/usergrps/dante/dtk.zip. > Instead there is dtk-logos.sty. > > Shouldn't the line > # > \DeclareLaTeXClass[dtk,dtklogos.sty,filecontents.sty,multicol.sty,ragged2e.sty]{Die

Wrong entry in dtk.layout?

2018-07-05 Thread Kornel Benko
The layout uses dtklogos.sty, but this is not provided by www.ctan.org/usergrps/dante/dtk.zip. Instead there is dtk-logos.sty. Shouldn't the line # \DeclareLaTeXClass[dtk,dtklogos.sty,filecontents.sty,multicol.sty,ragged2e.sty]{Die TeXnische Komoedie} be corrected? Kornel