Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:12:42AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > That looks interesting... I assume it does the round-trip save/load > thing? ...yes it does. > > And where is "define" defined with two string args? Just wondering. Sort of a hack. The first for export, the second for display. O

Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 02:46:36PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 04:24:16PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > So, yes, it works (well) in my tree, and no, it cannot have worked for > > anybody else, except perhaps Angus (Angus?). I remember seeing one > > error report on t

Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 04:24:16PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > So, yes, it works (well) in my tree, and no, it cannot have worked for > anybody else, except perhaps Angus (Angus?). I remember seeing one > error report on this on the list. > > At this point you could consider removing ^ from th

Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:48:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:01:01PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: >> How is this supposed to work? \mathcicumflex is not a macro known >> to LaTeX as far as I know? >

Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:01:01PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: >> > How is this supposed to work? \mathcicumflex is not a macro known >> to LaTeX > as far as I know? >> >> See lyx_sty.C lines 125-127 and LaTeXFeatures.C lines 300

Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:01:01PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > How is this supposed to work? \mathcicumflex is not a macro known to LaTeX > > as far as I know? > > See lyx_sty.C lines 125-127 and LaTeXFeatures.C lines 300-301. For how long has this lyx_sty.C been there? Has this been work

Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 04:19:50AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Well it's in the math panel black Misc (sort of confusing to have a blue > Misc and a black Misc BTW) and it's in math.bind, so presumably it is > supposed to work somehow. Hm... is this something that shoulkd appear as '^' on scre

Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 09:54:32PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > The circumflex in math lacks one line which AFAIK was there at some > > point in time, but has somehow disappeared from CVS. And it doesn't &g

Re: Circumflex bust (again)

2002-04-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 09:54:32PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > The circumflex in math lacks one line which AFAIK was there at some > point in time, but has somehow disappeared from CVS. And it doesn't > work (just try the sub-panel item under Misc). > > Applying this pa

Circumflex bust (again)

2002-03-31 Thread Martin Vermeer
Grr. The circumflex in math lacks one line which AFAIK was there at some point in time, but has somehow disappeared from CVS. And it doesn't work (just try the sub-panel item under Misc). Applying this patch will get it into proper working order (display, LaTeX, save/load) again.

(bug fix) circumflex, underscore in math

2002-01-23 Thread Martin Vermeer
This finally should lay to rest, in a way that is IMHO good enough for 1.2.0, the trouble with the circumflex and underscore symbol insertion in math. -- Martin 2002-01-24 Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * LaTeXFeatures.C: * lyx_sty.[Ch]: * math_m

Re: circumflex

2002-01-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
tings) you run into the problem. Not exactly. There is no \^u or \^a on a french keyboard (and we need them). However, we have a dead circumflex key which is different from the ^ key. JMarc

Re: circumflex

2002-01-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:57:34PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Duh. You're right... this really needs a rewrite. > With the appended patch you should be able to use @ as the > escape for typing underscore and circumflex, as well as > itself (@@). You are joking, aren'

Re: circumflex

2001-12-30 Thread Herbert Voss
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Anyway, here is a patch that will do just that. Personally I find the > required prefix M-m for sub/superscript a PITA. thanks, this seems to be a good solution Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: circumflex

2001-12-29 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 06:19:33PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: ... > To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: circumflex > > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > In other words... it should be configurable! (it is today in the &

Re: circumflex

2001-12-29 Thread Herbert Voss
Martin Vermeer wrote: > In other words... it should be configurable! (it is today in the > bind files, only not easily.) sure, but at first there should be the same behaviour in lyx for all parts. As I wrote it's different between insets like url's and the standard text. Herbert -- http://

Re: circumflex

2001-12-29 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:03:09PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: ... > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: circumflex > > Herbert Voss wrote: > > > > from my point of view the better way is to handle the > > ^ and _ as usual and as a special one in math! Than y

Re: circumflex

2001-12-28 Thread Herbert Voss
Martin Vermeer wrote: > It should... have you played around with preferences: X / LyX > handles deadkeys? yes, but without success > Anyway, I think this patch would be good for 1.2.0cvs, as > not being able to do the circumflex accent or underscore is > unacceptable and

Re: circumflex

2001-12-28 Thread Martin Vermeer
en-us > To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: circumflex > > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > With the appended patch you should be able to use @ as the > > escape for typing underscore and circumflex, as well as > > its

Re: circumflex

2001-12-28 Thread Herbert Voss
Martin Vermeer wrote: > With the appended patch you should be able to use @ as the > escape for typing underscore and circumflex, as well as > itself (@@). thanks for the patch, it works :-) anyway, I don't understand why circumflex-space doesn't works in lyx.

Re: circumflex

2001-12-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 08:00:53PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: ... > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:39:32PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > > ... > > > >>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: ci

Re: circumflex

2001-12-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:39:32PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > ... > >>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: circumflex >> >>where is the problem, when my circum-key (^ with space) >>doesn'

Re: circumflex

2001-12-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:39:32PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: ... > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: circumflex > > where is the problem, when my circum-key (^ with space) > doesn't work in lyx paragraphs but in all other insets lik

Re: circumflex

2001-12-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Herbert Voss wrote: > where is the problem, when my circum-key (^ with space) > doesn't work in lyx paragraphs but in all other insets like > url, ref and so on? Sorry, I meant normal paragraphs not the lyx-paragraph. here are some more informations: --- Workarea event: KEYBOARD Wo

circumflex

2001-12-27 Thread Herbert Voss
where is the problem, when my circum-key (^ with space) doesn't work in lyx paragraphs but in all other insets like url, ref and so on? Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/