On 05/16/2018 10:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2018 09:43:03 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck
> :
>
> > On 05/16/2018 02:54 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2018 22:02:06 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck
>
> > > :
>
> > >
>
> > > > Could NOT fin
Am Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2018 09:43:03 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck
:
> On 05/16/2018 02:54 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2018 22:02:06 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck
> > :
> >
> > > Could NOT find LYX_PY_polib (missing: LYX_PY_POLIB)
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Is that someth
On 05/16/2018 02:54 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2018 22:02:06 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck
> :
>
> > Could NOT find LYX_PY_polib (missing: LYX_PY_POLIB)
>
> >
>
> > Is that something I need to worry about?
>
> >
>
> > Riki
>
> >
>
>
>
> You will not be able to use po/ly
Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2018 22:02:06 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck
:
> Could NOT find LYX_PY_polib (missing: LYX_PY_POLIB)
>
> Is that something I need to worry about?
>
> Riki
>
You will not be able to use po/lyx_pot.py to re-create the translation files.
Kornel
signature.asc
Could NOT find LYX_PY_polib (missing: LYX_PY_POLIB)
Is that something I need to worry about?
Riki
Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2017 um 13:41:53, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:26:24AM +, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2017 um 10:07:01, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> >
> > > Le 05/10/2017 à 20:26, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > > > Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 20
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:26:24AM +, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2017 um 10:07:01, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
>
> > Le 05/10/2017 à 20:26, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > > Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2017 um 18:39:50, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> > >
> >
> > >> Same error,
Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2017 um 10:07:01, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> Le 05/10/2017 à 20:26, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2017 um 18:39:50, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> >
>
> >> Same error, sorry.
>
> > Should be fixed with 336f94d.
>
> Works fine with master (whe
Le 05/10/2017 à 20:26, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2017 um 18:39:50, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Same error, sorry.
Should be fixed with 336f94d.
Works fine with master (where I have the same files beginning with #).
Maybe you could cherry-pick it to 2.3.x?
BTW, I
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2017 um 18:39:50, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> Le 05/10/2017 à 18:27, Kornel Benko a écrit :
>
> >>
> >> But probably in your source directory is a file starting with '#'. Editing
> >> with emacs?
> >>
> >
> > Try this one
>
> Same error, sorry.
> I must go right n
Le 05/10/2017 à 18:27, Kornel Benko a écrit :
But probably in your source directory is a file starting with '#'. Editing with
emacs?
Try this one
Same error, sorry.
I must go right now, I will see this to-morrow, thanks.
--
Jean-Pierre
=ON
> > -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON
> > -DLYX_ENABLE_EXPORT_TESTS=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=ON -DLYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=ON
> > -DLYX_ENABLE_CXX11=AUTO -DLYX_USE_QT=QT5 -DLYX_LOCALVERSIONING=ON
> > ../newmaster >
> > cmake.log
> >
> > on 2.3.x, I get this:
&
Le 05/10/2017 à 18:17, Kornel Benko a écrit :
The OUTPUT refers to ${_created_doc}, so I would try to debug, e.g insert prior
to the 'custom_command()'
message(STATUS "output ${_created_doc}")
With this in development/cmake/doc/CMakeLists.txt:
SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES(${_create
_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=ON
> -DLYX_ENABLE_CXX11=AUTO -DLYX_USE_QT=QT5 -DLYX_LOCALVERSIONING=ON
> ../newmaster >
> cmake.log
>
> on 2.3.x, I get this:
>
> CMake Error at development/cmake/doc/CMakeLists.txt:31 (add_custom_command):
>add_custom_command called with OUTPUT containi
log
on 2.3.x, I get this:
CMake Error at development/cmake/doc/CMakeLists.txt:31 (add_custom_command):
add_custom_command called with OUTPUT containing a "#". This character is
not allowed.
Any clue?
--
Jean-Pierre
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Committing to 2.1-staging
Thanks for the fix, Kornel. It works well. I tested with and without
the packages.
Scott
Richard Heck wrote:
> That's what's intended, but patches that have been OK'd previously are
> probably fine. We can always roll them out if need be.
I'd still prefer to just ask once more before pushing. Else things will get
weak soon.
Jürgen
On 07/04/2013 01:32 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
What I committed, was already agreed (and waiting for Vincent). Nothing new.
I seem to misunderstand something.
My understanding was, in order to maintain some sort of control on the currently
captain-less ship, the procedur
Kornel Benko wrote:
> What I committed, was already agreed (and waiting for Vincent). Nothing new.
> I seem to misunderstand something.
My understanding was, in order to maintain some sort of control on the
currently captain-less ship, the procedure goes along
"Dev A: OK for 2.1-staging -- Dev B
Am Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2013 um 19:08:54, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Committing to 2.1-staging
>
> Hm, I thought we just agreed that we want explicit green light (for 2.1-
> staging commits, that is).
>
> (Not that I object to this commit, just for the sake of policy).
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Committing to 2.1-staging
Hm, I thought we just agreed that we want explicit green light (for 2.1-
staging commits, that is).
(Not that I object to this commit, just for the sake of policy).
Jürgen
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 11:57:56, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 10:54:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> >> > Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 11:04:00, s
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 10:54:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
>> > Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 11:04:00, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>> >
>
>> >
>
>> >> 01/07/2013 09:04, Kornel
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 10:54:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 11:04:00, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >
> >
> >> 01/07/2013 09:04, Kornel Benko:
> >
> >> > > -- checking for module 'xtst'
> >
> >> >
> >
> >> > >
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 11:04:00, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>
>> 01/07/2013 09:04, Kornel Benko:
>
>> > > -- checking for module 'xtst'
>
>> >
>
>> > > -- package 'xtst' not found
>
>> >
>
>> > I am sure, I needed this modules in order
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013 um 11:04:00, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> 01/07/2013 09:04, Kornel Benko:
> > > -- checking for module 'xtst'
> >
> > > -- package 'xtst' not found
> >
> > I am sure, I needed this modules in order to compile xvkbd, so it is
> > required.
> >
> > We may create option t
01/07/2013 09:04, Kornel Benko:
> -- checking for module 'xtst'
> -- package 'xtst' not found
I am sure, I needed this modules in order to compile xvkbd, so it is
required.
We may create option to disable autotests though.
Or disable them automatically when the packages are not installed.
YX_INSTALL_SUFFIX : 2.1
> --
> -- doxygen not found, ==> no doxygen creation
> -- Found PkgConfig: /usr/bin/pkg-config (found version "0.26")
> -- checking for module 'xaw7'
> -- package 'xaw7' not found
> CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2
on "0.26")
-- checking for module 'xaw7'
-- package 'xaw7' not found
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPkgConfig.cmake:279 (message):
A required package was not found
Call Stack (most recent call first):
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPkgConfig.
had failed. Can the
cmake error message be made more clear when the download fails?
Using downloaded dependencies in D:/D/bin86/msvc2010-deps
Downloading lyx20-deps-msvc2010-x86.zip ...
Found GNUWIN32: D:/D/bin86/msvc2010-deps/deps20
Found Qt-Version 4.7.3
CMake Error at modules/FindICONV.cmake
30 matches
Mail list logo