Re: compile error due to -fno-exception and boost

Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0200 or thereabouts, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | ... can be worked around by 'export CXXFLAGS=-fexceptions', './configure'. >> > >> | Not exactly nice though.

Re: compile error due to -fno-exception and boost

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0200 or thereabouts, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | ... can be worked around by 'export CXXFLAGS=-fexceptions', './configure'. > > > | Not exactly nice though. > > I wonder if we ever will be able to use exception

Re: compile error due to -fno-exception and boost

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> I wonder if we ever will be able to use exceptions... >> Or will we for ever need to cripple third-party libraries. > | What's wrong with exceptions? Nothing, except for the compil

Re: compile error due to -fno-exception and boost

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I wonder if we ever will be able to use exceptions... > Or will we for ever need to cripple third-party libraries. What's wrong with exceptions? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will

Re: compile error due to -fno-exception and boost

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ... can be worked around by 'export CXXFLAGS=-fexceptions', './configure'. > | Not exactly nice though. I wonder if we ever will be able to use exceptions... Or will we for ever need to cripple third-party libraries. -- Lgb

compile error due to -fno-exception and boost

... can be worked around by 'export CXXFLAGS=-fexceptions', './configure'. Not exactly nice though. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)