Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-30 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:50:07AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > As always, something is lacking. > Done at f04f7cc. Thank you. I inverted some unreliable tests at 795fa586. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-30 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 um 09:38:24, schrieb Guenter Milde > Dear Kornel and Scott, > > On 2016-11-29, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 29. November 2016 um 18:24:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:11:29PM +0100,

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-30 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear Kornel and Scott, On 2016-11-29, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 29. November 2016 um 18:24:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:11:29PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > What about the attached? Scott could you try? >> Tested and works well.

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-29 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2016 um 18:24:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:11:29PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > What about the attached? Scott could you try? > > Tested and works well. Thanks for your work on this! > > Scott Committed to master at

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-29 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:11:29PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > What about the attached? Scott could you try? Tested and works well. Thanks for your work on this! Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-29 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 28. November 2016 um 23:07:49, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-11-28, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 28. November 2016 um 10:14:18, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:24:43AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Let us

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-28 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-11-28, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 28. November 2016 um 10:14:18, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:24:43AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Let us wait for Günter, he may have some ideas ... Just my old suggestion: make unreliable independent

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-28 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 28. November 2016 um 10:14:18, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:24:43AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > You could make an alias ... > > True. I didn't actually mean the command itself. > > > > When I add a pattern to invertedTests, it does not

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:24:43AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > You could make an alias ... True. I didn't actually mean the command itself. > > When I add a pattern to invertedTests, it does not affect the unreliable > > tests. Can we change this? > > We had some discussions about this. The

Re: ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-28 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2016 um 15:58:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > I think we've had this discussion in part before, but I could not find > the thread. > > We are almost at 0 failing tests except for the unreliable tests. I > think we should invert the unreliable tests that

ctests: invert failing unreliable tests

2016-11-27 Thread Scott Kostyshak
I think we've had this discussion in part before, but I could not find the thread. We are almost at 0 failing tests except for the unreliable tests. I think we should invert the unreliable tests that are failing, so that the output from just a vanilla "ctest" command is clean. Since these tests