Re: empty LyXLength

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Would it be possible to use a special unit for this? UNIT_EMPTY or something? Yes, if it does not appear in units popups... Alternatively, a bool would work very well. JMarc

Re: empty LyXLength

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Yes, if it does not appear in units popups... Alternatively, a bool would work very well. As you may have noticed, I'm off that discussion because I do not understand much of this. In any case I'll need help on this. I do not even know how a bool

Re: empty LyXLength

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Would it be possible to use a "special" unit for this? > > UNIT_EMPTY or something? Yes, if it does not appear in units popups... Alternatively, a bool would work very well. JMarc

Re: empty LyXLength

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes, if it does not appear in units popups... > Alternatively, a bool would work very well. As you may have noticed, I'm off that discussion because I do not understand much of this. In any case I'll need help on this. I do not even know how a bool

empty LyXLength

Would it be possible to use a special unit for this? UNIT_EMPTY or something? -- Lgb

empty LyXLength

Would it be possible to use a "special" unit for this? UNIT_EMPTY or something? -- Lgb