Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-17 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 10:50 schrieb Dov Feldstern: > I just spent two hours playing around with this, and it turns out that > the problem *is* with the way LyX is writing the output. I don't exactly > understand what's going on, but I was able to fix it with a really > simple patch (attac

Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-16 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 10:50 schrieb Dov Feldstern: > I just spent two hours playing around with this, and it turns out that > the problem *is* with the way LyX is writing the output. That is good, because it means that we can fix it. > I don't exactly > understand what's going on, but

Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-16 Thread Dov Feldstern
Georg Baum wrote: Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 13:18 schrieb Dov Feldstern: One strange thing that I'm seeing, though, is that the dvi output when using "auto" and "default" is not identical: I tried this out on a file which fits really tightly on the page --- when using "default" it all fits

Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-14 Thread Georg Baum
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 13:18 schrieb Dov Feldstern: > One strange thing that I'm seeing, though, is that the dvi output when > using "auto" and "default" is not identical: I tried this out on a file > which fits really tightly on the page --- when using "default" it all > fits on one page,

Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-14 Thread Dov Feldstern
Georg Baum wrote: Dov Feldstern wrote: Georg Baum wrote: I propose to change the conversion of files with "default" inputencoding to be the same as with "auto", together with the corresponding changes in LyX itself. The only difference between "auto" and "default" in LyX 1.5 would then be t

Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-13 Thread Georg Baum
Dov Feldstern wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > >> I propose to change the conversion of files with "default" inputencoding >> to be the same as with "auto", together with the corresponding changes in >> LyX itself. The only difference between "auto" and "default" in LyX 1.5 >> would then be that docu

Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> After the unicode merge to trunk in summer we discussed the Georg> Of course that means that all "default" documents that are Georg> already converted to 1.5 would not be valid anymore. We can afford that. Georg> IMO this is better

Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-09 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 8:02 pm, Georg Baum wrote: > Opinions? If this is OK I'll develop a patch (will be easy). Yes, it is OK. That is the price to pay for using the bleeding edge, sometimes bleeds happen. ;-) > > Georg -- José Abílio

Re: inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-09 Thread Dov Feldstern
Georg Baum wrote: I propose to change the conversion of files with "default" inputencoding to be the same as with "auto", together with the corresponding changes in LyX itself. The only difference between "auto" and "default" in LyX 1.5 would then be that documents with "auto" would use the in

inputencoding "default" again

2007-01-09 Thread Georg Baum
After the unicode merge to trunk in summer we discussed the question what \inputencoding default in a LyX file was supposed to do. We came to the conclusion then that this simply meant to not use the inputenc package, and simply output the document in 8bit characters as is. Then the question a