unfortunately has no tabbed dialog boxes. It would certainly look
> better.
Ahhh, it must have been tix(?) or one of those extra toolkits that has
tabbed boxes.
> tcl/tk is a great language for rapid prototyping. Once neoprene/latexconf
> stabilizes, translation to perl/tk or e
;-) Of course perl/tk would be great for this. Unfortunately
> I don't know it and taking off time to learn it would slow me down too much.
>
> tcl/tk is a great language for rapid prototyping. Once neoprene/latexconf
> stabilizes, translation to perl/tk or even gtk should not be v
arn it would slow me down too much.
tcl/tk is a great language for rapid prototyping. Once neoprene/latexconf
stabilizes, translation to perl/tk or even gtk should not be very difficult.
But not yet in the present, experimental phase.
Martin
On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> A very early implementation of LaTeXConf can be found at
>
> http://www.netby.net/Oest/Europa-Alle/vermeer/lcf.tcl
>
> with the help file as lcf.help in the same dir. (The same place also
> holds the neoprene stuff.)
>
> A
A very early implementation of LaTeXConf can be found at
http://www.netby.net/Oest/Europa-Alle/vermeer/lcf.tcl
with the help file as lcf.help in the same dir. (The same place also
holds the neoprene stuff.)
All VERY preliminary. But you can get an idea of what I have in mind.
(And just in
It may interest you to know that I have decided to see if the`latexconf'
idea mentioned here some months ago has the potential of being realized.
What I am currently doing is create a set of LaTeX classes (based on the
base classes, and backward compatible with them) that are mass
Thanks for all this friendly feedback,
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:59:16 +1000 (GMT+1000), Allan Rae wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Arnd Hanses wrote:
>> Also I'm looking forward to receive some bug reports, suggestions,
>> fixes, etc. in order to improve this.
>
>One bug I fixed in LyX (after 1.0.0) th
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Arnd Hanses wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now that LyX 1.0.0 bug reporting is calming down a little, I would like
> to discuss the possibility of releasing alfnum.cls, etc.
>
> The files I've mailed to the list a month ago, attached as alfanum.zip
> or similar. If somebody has missed th
Hi,
now that LyX 1.0.0 bug reporting is calming down a little, I would like
to discuss the possibility of releasing alfnum.cls, etc.
The files I've mailed to the list a month ago, attached as alfanum.zip
or similar. If somebody has missed them, just ask me.
Also I'm looking forward to receive s
http://visar.csustan.edu/bazaar/bazaar_list.html
In addition to the hebrew word processor, there's something that looks like
(a piece of) what Martin was requesting for LaTeX. And apparently someone's
working on it.
-Amir
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> I wouldn't be so sure... typically what you find are packages
Martin> that change things to a different, but equally rigid scheme.
Martin> This is really a thing that has disappointed me a little in
Martin> LaTeX. Of course it
> "Arnd" == Arnd Hanses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arnd> This is what I'm trying to do in a limited way with my
Arnd> alfanum.cls: just adding things I'd like to see in LyX. (I'm
Arnd> using LyX/2, the OS/2 port of Miyata san; three cheers for his
Arnd> work, combined with EmTeX and XDVI/2 i
On Tue, 02 Feb 1999 11:57:28 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> I would suggest also to have a look into jura.cls and alphanumeric.sty of CTAN.
>
>I did; looks fascinating. However this is not quite what I had in mind.
>Didn't find alfanum.cls, though.
Yes I see, your project is the fast and easy
On Mon, 01 Feb 1999 20:16:45 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>True. So lyxarticle.cls, lyxbook.cls, ... with same functionality
>but "handles" added. Hmm?
>
This is what I'm trying to do in a limited way with my alfanum.cls: just adding things
I'd
like to see in LyX. (I'm using LyX/2, the OS/2
*Amir Karger writes:
| Also, what makes it emacs-style? vim can do it too, e.g.
Created when reading the vc.el files.
Lgb
> "Rich" == Rich Fields at 407 356 5842 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That's why I think that, if we decide to build the ultimate
>> configurable class, the first thing to do is ask for help on
>> comp.text.tex. Such a project should be a pure LaTeX project at
>> first. When it works, then
Jean-Marc writes
> > "Rich" == Rich Fields at 407 356 5842 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rich> This is where I fall short in using latex2e. I was a heavy
> Rich> latex2.09 user starting in the mid/late-80s and had to create
> Rich> significant hacks to areas like you are discussing and
> Rich
> "Rich" == Rich Fields at 407 356 5842 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> This is where I fall short in using latex2e. I was a heavy
Rich> latex2.09 user starting in the mid/late-80s and had to create
Rich> significant hacks to areas like you are discussing and
Rich> more. Unfortunately, I t
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Martin> While leafing through book.cls (renamed to fgibook.cls,
> > Martin> fgibook.layout to follow) I noticed that there is so much
> > Martin> stuff hardwired that could be put into a variable using
> > Martin> \newcomman
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> While leafing through book.cls (renamed to fgibook.cls,
> Martin> fgibook.layout to follow) I noticed that there is so much
> Martin> stuff hardwired that could be put into a variable using
> Martin> \newcommand. Some stuf
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> While leafing through book.cls (renamed to fgibook.cls,
Martin> fgibook.layout to follow) I noticed that there is so much
Martin> stuff hardwired that could be put into a variable using
Martin> \newcommand. Some stuff is user re
Amir Karger wrote:
>
> The latexconf idea is great. Although it seems like LaTeX already has tons
> of parameters, there are clearly a bunch of lengths and texts which are
> hard-coded. However, it sounds to me like a major project, which only
> overlaps with LyX at the later (eas
The latexconf idea is great. Although it seems like LaTeX already has tons
of parameters, there are clearly a bunch of lengths and texts which are
hard-coded. However, it sounds to me like a major project, which only
overlaps with LyX at the later (easier) parts. And we seem to have only a
couple
Ready to Rock & Roll. :-)
Best regards
--
Larry S. Marso
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 05:50:06PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Here is the 1.0.3 version
[looks great, we all love it, blah blah blah]
I have to agree with Larry on the "emacs-style" thing.
Why not just say "version control for collaborative authoring".
Anyone who knows what version control is doesn't need to be told it's
emacs-style, while anyone who doesn't know has at least a *c
Here is the 1.0.3 version with two point corrections only.
I have also been thinking about the "latexconf" idea, as this weekend I had
to design a class file for out Institute's Reports series. (The proposed
design was so awful that I couldn't keep my mouth shut. No good
>>>>> "Larry" == Larry S Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Larry> Another superior feature for the proposed "latexconf" facility
Larry> would be the ability to create defined terms. I'm imagining a
Larry> *LyX* entry field, in which y
Another superior feature for the proposed "latexconf" facility would be the
ability to create defined terms. I'm imagining a *LyX* entry field, in
which you could enter either text formatted using LyX's ordinary set of
Layout tools, or even enter ERT, with LyX outputing inte
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Liisa Vermeer wrote:
Snip --->8
> Yeah, the are good at copying. I believe that the whole original idea of
> paragraph styles, style sheets, etc. was pinched straight from LaTeX.
> (well,
> where did Lamport get it from originally? Wasn't there a software called
> 'Scribe'
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 08:28:22AM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 02:59:12PM -0800, Liisa Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > It is the idea for a little program that can be called "latexconf",
> > whose
> > only function it would be to in
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 02:59:12PM -0800, Liisa Vermeer wrote:
>
> I have actually an idea worth thinking about ...
> It is the idea for a little program that can be called "latexconf",
> whose
> only function it would be to interactively compose a file redefining
&
Word.
"The other headers in BIG letters, numbered, flush left. Headers and
paragraphs to be separated by one blank line without indent."
Beautiful, ain't it? ;-}
I have actually an idea worth thinking about but for which I will have
no time to do anything about in t
32 matches
Mail list logo
