On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 12:19:20PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 03:37:22AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > >On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:27:57AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> > >
> > >> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Attached my attempt. I a
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I would surprise me if very old python versions would
still work correctly for LyX. configure.ac seems to require
2.3, which definitely has +=. (But not i++, which would be
even better)
So, shall I replace all i = i + 1 by i += 1, and commit
my layout2layout? Do any objec
> > So, shall I replace all i = i + 1 by i += 1, and commit
> > my layout2layout? Do any objections come to mind?
> >
> Perhaps we should check with Bo. I'm sure he knows exactly what version
> we require and what its capabilities are. So I'm adding him to the cc
> list here.
Lyx requires python 2
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
So, shall I replace all i = i + 1 by i += 1, and commit
my layout2layout? Do any objections come to mind?
Perhaps we should check with Bo. I'm sure he knows exactly what version
we require and what its capabilities are. So I'm adding him to the cc
list here.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 09:47:29PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I would surprise me if very old python versions would
> still work correctly for LyX. configure.ac seems to require
> 2.3, which definitely has +=. (But not i++, which would be
> even better)
>
> So, shall I replace all i = i + 1 b
