I forgot to mention the most exciting thing of all
I'm intending to add parameterized chunks; so you can define a chunk to
illustrate an algorithm which you can then "instantiate" in various
places to work on specific data.
I've been using this model a lot for one project and had to keep
Gorjanc Gregor wrote:
Based upon previous work I used literate classes since
this has been proposed earlier. However, Jean-Marc has been working on another
approach with modules,
which make literate classes for R-LyX obsolete. Right Jean-Marc? Can this
approach also be used for noweb
and work o
>> Based upon previous work I used literate classes since
>> this has been proposed earlier. However, Jean-Marc has been working on
>> another approach with modules,
>> which make literate classes for R-LyX obsolete. Right Jean-Marc? Can this
>> approach also be used for noweb
>> and work of Sam?
Sam Liddicott schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>> Can I use it on Windows ?
I haven't got windows to try but AFAIk there is nothign
windows-specific or even path-related in it, so I guess you
can, as long as you have a decent awk for windows.
>
> Please let me know ho
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>> Can I use it on Windows ?
I haven't got windows to try but AFAIk there is nothign
windows-specific or even path-related in it, so I guess you
can, as long as you have a decent awk for windows.
>
> Please let me know how you get on.
Can't i
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>> Can I use it on Windows ?
>
> I haven't got windows to try but AFAIk there is nothign
> windows-specific or even path-related in it, so I guess you
> can, as long as you have a decent awk for windows.
>
> Please let me know how you get on.
Can't
Gorjanc Gregor wrote:
Hi Sam!
This sounds interesting, though a bit to technical for me. My work regarding
the literate programming
with LyX was with R - statistical package that provides tangle and weave
commands that extract R code
and replace code with results, respectively.
Aye, I read
>> Can I use it on Windows ?
>
> I haven't got windows to try but AFAIk there is nothign
> windows-specific or even path-related in it, so I guess you
> can, as long as you have a decent awk for windows.
>
> Please let me know how you get on.
Can't it be done using Python (hoping this i
Hi Sam!
This sounds interesting, though a bit to technical for me. My work regarding
the literate programming
with LyX was with R - statistical package that provides tangle and weave
commands that extract R code
and replace code with results, respectively. Based upon previous work I used
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
notangle (which was buggy) is not used to generate
the source, instead an awk script, newfangle, is used,
fixing various notangle bugs; such as:
Can I use it on Windows ?
I haven't got windows to try but AFAIk there is nothign windows-specific
or eve
> notangle (which was buggy) is not used to generate
> the source, instead an awk script, newfangle, is used,
> fixing various notangle bugs; such as:
Can I use it on Windows ?
Vincent
At the suggestion of kayvan, I posted this message that was originally
sent to lyx-users. I hope I got the right addresses for Cc:
I've posted on http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/6137/
my alternative literate programming style with Lyx. I put this together
because literate programming
> "Edmar" == Edmar Wienskoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edmar> I had another idea:
Edmar> 1 - We define Scrap as a paragraph. Which implies that will be
Edmar> no need to patch anything.
Edmar> 2 - The code segments must be typed with c-return at each code
Edmar> line. Which implies tha
> "Edmar" == Edmar Wienskoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edmar> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I'm not sure either we are talking about the same thing :) I tried
>> what you describe and came up with the files appended. They seem
>> alright to me.
Edmar> Probally you highlited the text and
Edmar Wienskoski Jr. wrote:
> I'd rather come up with a solution which works
correctly in other
> cases. For example, your problem is not different from the problem
> encountered for LyX-Code environment. This environment as it stands
is
> a painful hack and we will have to do some clean up there
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You mean an Item_Environment, right? A real environment should add the
> empty lines too. As far as Item_Environment are concerned, you rely on
> the fact that they are output as
>
> \begin{foo}
> \item aaa
> \item bb
> \end{foo}
Yes, that is correct. An Item_Enviro
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I'm not sure either we are talking about the same thing :) I tried
> what you describe and came up with the files appended. They seem
> alright to me.
Probally you highlited the text and past it into lyx, right ?
That is another strange thing Whenever you highlight
> "Edmar" == Edmar Wienskoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edmar> No, that is not entirely true. Actually, the fact that "return"
Edmar> ends a layout is not even a concern (I can use alt-return
Edmar> instead of plain ret...) The problem, is that if you define
Edmar> the Scrap layout to be a
> "Edmar" == Edmar Wienskoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edmar> Wait a minute. I don't think we are talking about the same
Edmar> thing. Note that the patch I provided is to change the
Edmar> behavior within *latex* paragraphs.
Edmar> Try the following in you lyx:
Edmar> Open a latex para
Amir Karger wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 07:04:33PM -0600, Edmar Wienskoski Jr. wrote:
> >
> > No, that is not entirely true. Actually, the fact that "return" ends
> > a layout is not even a concern (I can use alt-return instead of plain ret...)
> > The problem, is that if you define the Scra
On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 07:04:33PM -0600, Edmar Wienskoski Jr. wrote:
>
> No, that is not entirely true. Actually, the fact that "return" ends
> a layout is not even a concern (I can use alt-return instead of plain ret...)
> The problem, is that if you define the Scrap layout to be anything diffe
> > "Edmar" == Edmar Wienskoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Edmar> 3 - Patch to not output the protected space '~' during
> Edmar> translation of latex paragraphs. It seems that latex does not
> Edmar> complain if you put '~' characters in place of regular ' ',
> Edmar> even within latex
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Edmar> The patch 5 associates latex command "dummy" to "do not
> Edmar> generate \begin{} \end{} nor \tem". With that patch applied,
> Edmar> and defining the Scrap layout to be: Style Scrap LatexType
> Edmar> Item_Environment LatexName dummy
>
> The right
> "Edmar" == Edmar Wienskoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edmar> 3 - Patch to not output the protected space '~' during
Edmar> translation of latex paragraphs. It seems that latex does not
Edmar> complain if you put '~' characters in place of regular ' ',
Edmar> even within latex commands. B
> "Edmar" == Edmar Wienskoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Patch 5 is perhaps ok, but I am not sure what problem it tries to
>> solve.
Edmar> Noweb, like other literate packages, expects to read a
Edmar> latexfile with some noweb commands intermixed. The noweb
Edmar> commands are then tran
Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Sometime ago I tried some patches and external
scripts to use lyx for
> literate programming, and I had used it for some reasonable sized
> projects already.
Great job! I have to say that it's very impressive work!
> I would like to submit these patches (against l
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
*Edmar Wienskoski writes:
| Sometime ago I tried some patches and external scripts to use
lyx
| for literate programming, and I had used it for some reasonable
| sized projects already.
Patch 1 seems ok
Patch 2 seems ok
Patch 3 seems ok
Patch 4 is not something I wan
> Also, there is no integrated documentation for the feature.
>
> I suggest that this can live as a contribution patch, just like Rik's
> mailmerge patch.
one little request: please don't cream my place on the edit menu :) I
took the first entry after the stuff that didn't seem to be used; co
> Sometime ago I tried some patches and external scripts to use lyx for
> literate programming, and I had used it for some reasonable sized
> projects already.
Great job! I have to say that it's very impressive work!
> I would like to submit these patches (against lyx-1.0.0pre4) for your
> appr
*Edmar Wienskoski writes:
| Sometime ago I tried some patches and external scripts to use lyx
| for literate programming, and I had used it for some reasonable
| sized projects already.
Patch 1 seems ok
Patch 2 seems ok
Patch 3 seems ok
Patch 4 is not something I want, especially I think the "
Hi there !!
Sometime ago I tried some patches and external scripts to use lyx for
literate programming, and I had used it for some reasonable sized
projects already.
I decided that it was a successful experience, so I re-coded the
patches and incorporated the scripts within lyx, trying to prese
31 matches
Mail list logo
