On Wednesday 28 August 2002 06:47, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Reading a message from Allan it appears that klyx comes with some 2.10
files.
| It certainly would not hurt if we could claim compatibility, but I'd find
| the possibility of downgrading more important. [Btw: It just occured to
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre My oldest docs are 2.15, so I have no real personal interest.
Andre But what does klyx produce? Shouldn't that be around 0.10?
Yes, supporting klyx format is important, if we want it to definitely
die. And I think
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 10:13, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre My oldest docs are 2.15, so I have no real personal interest.
Andre But what does klyx produce? Shouldn't that be around 0.10?
Yes, supporting klyx format
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:31:33AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
although true is not realistic. It is impossible to find an 0.8[16] xforms
version compiled for present systems.
With a little hacking it is possible to get the oldest lyx version of
ftp.lyx.org to compile and
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 16:33, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:31:33AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
although true is not realistic. It is impossible to find an 0.8[16]
xforms version compiled for present systems.
With a little hacking it is possible to get
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:54:08PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
Yes. I have done that until 0.10.7. For that version I have to install
xforms 0.86. All others (including 1.2.1) can compile with 0.88.
So my problem is 0.10.7, not all the others. :-)
And even for 0.10.7
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 06:47, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Reading a message from Allan it appears that klyx comes with some 2.10
files.
> | It certainly would not hurt if we could claim compatibility, but I'd find
> | the possibility of downgrading more important. [Btw: It just occured
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> My oldest docs are 2.15, so I have no real personal interest.
> Andre> But what does klyx produce? Shouldn't that be around 0.10?
>
> Yes, supporting klyx format is important, if we want it to definitely
> die. And I
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 10:13, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Andre> My oldest docs are 2.15, so I have no real personal interest.
> > Andre> But what does klyx produce? Shouldn't that be around 0.10?
> >
> > Yes, supporting
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:31:33AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> although true is not realistic. It is impossible to find an 0.8[16] xforms
> version compiled for present systems.
With a little hacking it is possible to get the oldest lyx version of
ftp.lyx.org to compile and
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 16:33, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:31:33AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > although true is not realistic. It is impossible to find an 0.8[16]
> > xforms version compiled for present systems.
>
> With a little hacking it is possible to
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:54:08PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Yes. I have done that until 0.10.7. For that version I have to install
> xforms 0.86. All others (including 1.2.1) can compile with 0.88.
>
> So my problem is 0.10.7, not all the others. :-)
>
> And even for
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 18:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified files:
lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/: lyxconvert_215.py
Log message:
Extend compatibility up to 0.12.0
It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
I was also able to compile 0.12.0 (after some simple fixes
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:43:17PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
Nice work.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 16:43, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
I was also able to compile 0.12.0 (after some simple fixes, all related
with implicit initialization), and run it.
Since I have 0.12 running I can take the convertion
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:04:48PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 16:43, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
I was also able to compile 0.12.0 (after some simple fixes, all related
with implicit
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:04:48PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| On Tuesday 27 August 2002 16:43, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
| I was also able to compile 0.12.0 (after some
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 18:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/: lyxconvert_215.py
>
> Log message:
> Extend compatibility up to 0.12.0
It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
I was also able to compile 0.12.0
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:43:17PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
Nice work.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 16:43, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
> I was also able to compile 0.12.0 (after some simple fixes, all related
> with implicit initialization), and run it.
Since I have 0.12 running I can take the convertion
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:04:48PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 August 2002 16:43, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
> > I was also able to compile 0.12.0 (after some simple fixes, all related
> > with implicit
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:04:48PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| > On Tuesday 27 August 2002 16:43, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| > > It should be now safe to convert 0.12.0 documents.
| > > I was also able to compile 0.12.0
22 matches
Mail list logo
