On 05/21/2014 05:40 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2014-05-20 9:55 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller:
The problem was that the argument of the nested column was falsely
read as an argument to the embedding overprint. The attached
patch, which extends yours, fixes the problem for me. The f
2014-05-20 9:55 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>
> The problem was that the argument of the nested column was falsely read as
> an argument to the embedding overprint. The attached patch, which extends
> yours, fixes the problem for me. The file opens in 2.0 without warnings and
> compiles fine.
>
2014-05-20 11:11 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>
> With the attached patch, the document also is converted correctly back to
> 2.1.
>
Forget this last patch. Does not work.
Jürgen
>
> Jürgen
>
>
2014-05-20 9:55 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> The problem was that the argument of the nested column was falsely read as
> an argument to the embedding overprint. The attached patch, which extends
> yours, fixes the problem for me. The file opens in 2.0 without warnings and
> compiles fine.
>
W
2014-05-19 23:53 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri:
> In beamerlyxexample1.lyx there are two Overprint environments, one after
> the other. Deleting the first one of them (and everything nested inside),
> the conversion succeeds and the file can be compiled with lyx-2.0.
> However, the result does not c
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:34:17PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> With the attached patch I can export beamerlyxexample1.lyx to 2.0 format
> and load it with lyx-2.0 without error. But then it fails to compile :(
> Someone who really understand what has to happen should have a closer
> look.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 07:37:15PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:41:01AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> > On 05/08/2014 02:42 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > >>2014-05-08 8:29 GMT+02:00 Jürgen
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:41:01AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/08/2014 02:42 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> >>2014-05-08 8:29 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> >>
> >>>Don't see this with current branch.
> >>>
> >>Ah, you
On 05/08/2014 02:42 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2014-05-08 8:29 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
Don't see this with current branch.
Ah, you talk about opening in 2.0.x. Can you track it down further?
Jürgen, it seems that t
On 05/08/2014 02:42 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2014-05-08 8:29 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
Don't see this with current branch.
Ah, you talk about opening in 2.0.x. Can you track it down further?
Jürgen, it seems that t
2014-05-08 20:42 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri:
> Jürgen, it seems that there is a problem when inserting an EndFrame layout.
> Seemingly, these layouts are always enclosed in extra \end_layout and
> \end_deeper tags. The attached patch against stable let me export Pavel's
> example file to 2.0 corr
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-05-08 8:29 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Don't see this with current branch.
> >
>
> Ah, you talk about opening in 2.0.x. Can you track it down further?
Jürgen, it seems that there is a problem when inserting an En
2014-05-08 20:11 GMT+02:00 Pavel Sanda :
> It is 2.1 file. Are you sure you didn't save the file meanwhile? P
>
Oh, I see. I'll see if I find some time eventually.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-05-08 20:03 GMT+02:00 Pavel Sanda :
>
> > The attached lyx file in previous mail didn't help you reproduce? P
> >
>
> No. A 2.1 file would be better.
It is 2.1 file. Are you sure you didn't save the file meanwhile? P
2014-05-08 20:03 GMT+02:00 Pavel Sanda :
> The attached lyx file in previous mail didn't help you reproduce? P
>
No. A 2.1 file would be better.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-05-08 19:39 GMT+02:00 Pavel Sanda:
>
> > Looks like lyx2lyx won't preserve \begin_deeper \end_deeper pairs.
> > Don't have time to investigate now.
> >
>
> OK. But this is certainly not enough information to debug.
The attached lyx file in previous mail didn't he
2014-05-08 19:39 GMT+02:00 Pavel Sanda:
> Looks like lyx2lyx won't preserve \begin_deeper \end_deeper pairs.
> Don't have time to investigate now.
>
OK. But this is certainly not enough information to debug.
Jürgen
>
> Pavel
>
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-05-08 8:29 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Don't see this with current branch.
> >
>
> Ah, you talk about opening in 2.0.x. Can you track it down further?
Looks like lyx2lyx won't preserve \begin_deeper \end_deeper pairs.
Don't have time to investigate now.
2014-05-08 8:29 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Don't see this with current branch.
>
Ah, you talk about opening in 2.0.x. Can you track it down further?
Jürgen
>
> Jürgen
>
>
>
2014-05-08 6:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel Sanda:
> Hi,
>
> sorry to crash the release party but after creating beamer file in 2.1.x
> and trying to load it in 2.0.x
>
> I still see bunch of strange errors:
> Text.cpp (1766): Handling unknown body token: `\end_layout'
> LyX: \end_deeper: depth is already nul
Hi,
sorry to crash the release party but after creating beamer file in 2.1.x and
trying to load it in 2.0.x
I still see bunch of strange errors:
Text.cpp (1766): Handling unknown body token: `\end_layout'
LyX: \end_deeper: depth is already null [around line 119 of file
/trash/lyx_tmpdir.M26137/
21 matches
Mail list logo
