Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 06/28/2013 04:00 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 28/06/2013 06:37, Scott Kostyshak: If not, someone should post a test file illustrating it. Put

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 06/28/2013 04:00 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> >>> 28/06/2013 06:37, Scott Kostyshak: > > If not, someone should post > a test

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 06/28/2013 04:00 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 28/06/2013 06:37, Scott Kostyshak: If not, someone should post a test file illustrating it. Put it on trac and cc me, and I'll get to it. I don't know anything about

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/28/2013 04:00 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >> 28/06/2013 06:37, Scott Kostyshak: If not, someone should post a test file illustrating it. Put it on trac and cc me, and I'll get to it. >>> >>>

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

28/06/2013 06:37, Scott Kostyshak: If not, someone should post a test file illustrating it. Put it on trac and cc me, and I'll get to it. I don't know anything about these files, but noweb2lyx.lyx and listerrors.lyx are both failing on trunk. They fail because of Layout `Chunk' was not found..

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On 06/28/2013 04:00 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 28/06/2013 06:37, Scott Kostyshak: If not, someone should post a test file illustrating it. Put it on trac and cc me, and I'll get to it. I don't know anything about these files, but noweb2lyx.lyx and listerrors.lyx are both failing on

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

28/06/2013 06:37, Scott Kostyshak: If not, someone should post a test file illustrating it. Put it on trac and cc me, and I'll get to it. I don't know anything about these files, but noweb2lyx.lyx and listerrors.lyx are both failing on trunk. They fail because of <>. Are Chunk layouts

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On 06/28/2013 04:00 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 28/06/2013 06:37, Scott Kostyshak: If not, someone should post a test file illustrating it. Put it on trac and cc me, and I'll get to it. I don't know anything about these files, but noweb2lyx.lyx and listerrors.lyx are both failing on

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 06/24/2013 01:42 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org a écrit : On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: Chunk

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/24/2013 01:42 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >>> wrote: 03/06/2013 19:38, Scott

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On 06/24/2013 01:42 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org a écrit : On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: Chunk layouts containing newlines should be transformed to one chunk inset. The

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On 06/24/2013 01:42 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: Chunk layouts containing newlines should be transformed to one chunk inset.

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 06/03/2013 12:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: Works as you describe now. Thanks. Liviu, do you know what needs to be done here? Do the chunks need to be converted to ERT or can the new insets be used? We have the same problem with examples/listerrors.lyx Chunk layouts containing newlines should be

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: Works as you describe now. Thanks. Liviu, do you know what needs to be done here? Do the chunks need to be converted to ERT or can the new insets be used? We have the same

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org a écrit : On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: 03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: Chunk layouts containing newlines should be transformed to one chunk inset. The newlines are equivalent to having several

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 06/03/2013 12:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> >>> To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: >>> noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: Works as you describe now. Thanks. Liviu, do you know what needs to be done here? Do the chunks need to be converted to ERT or can the new insets be used? We have the same problem with examples/listerrors.lyx Chunk layouts containing newlines should be

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: > >> Works as you describe now. Thanks. >> >> Liviu, do you know what needs to be done here? Do the chunks need to >> be converted to ERT or can the new insets be used? We have

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> 03/06/2013 19:38, Scott Kostyshak: >> >>> >> Chunk layouts containing newlines should be transformed to one chunk >inset. >> The newlines are equivalent to having

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On 06/03/2013 12:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it. Is this still being worked on? I'll have a look. rh

lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it. Is this still being worked on? Scott

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On 06/03/2013 12:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it. Is this still being worked on? All right, so the problem is that this does not have the sort of

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 06/03/2013 12:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it. Is this still being worked

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On 06/03/2013 12:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it. Is this still being worked on? I'll have a look. rh

lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it. Is this still being worked on? Scott

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On 06/03/2013 12:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it. Is this still being worked on? All right, so the problem is that this does not have the sort of

Re: lyx2lyx broken for noweb?

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/03/2013 12:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> To reproduce, with 2.1git open examples/noweb2lyx. I get: >> noweb2lyx.lyx is from an older version of LyX and the lyx2lyx script >> failed to convert it. >> >> Is this still

lyx2lyx broken?

I get Warning: 332: Format not supported. When building TOC.lyx with scons: env_toc([/usr/local/share/lyx16/doc/ru/TOC.lyx], [lib/doc/Customization.lyx, lib/doc/EmbeddedObjects.lyx, lib/doc/Extended.lyx, lib/doc/ru/FAQ.lyx, lib/doc/ru/Intro.lyx, lib/doc/Math.lyx, lib/doc/ru/Tutorial.lyx,

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

On Monday 12 May 2008 16:14:37 Bo Peng wrote: I get Warning: 332: Format not supported. When building TOC.lyx with scons: env_toc([/usr/local/share/lyx16/doc/ru/TOC.lyx], [lib/doc/Customization.lyx, lib/doc/EmbeddedObjects.lyx, lib/doc/Extended.lyx, lib/doc/ru/FAQ.lyx,

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

lyx2lyx or something similar should be broken. Which version of python? 2.5.1 Bo

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

On Monday 12 May 2008 16:43:17 Bo Peng wrote: lyx2lyx or something similar should be broken. Which version of python? 2.5.1 Me too, and it works here. What does ./lyx2lyx -l says? That it fails with that error message is strange because the last file format is 333. Bo --

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

Me too, and it works here. False alarm. Sorry. It seems to me that when I run scons in multi-thread mode, the TOC is built from system lyx2lyx, which has not been updated. The solution should be letting toc depends on lyx2lyx ... Cheers, Bo

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

False alarm. Sorry. It seems to me that when I run scons in multi-thread mode, the TOC is built from system lyx2lyx, which has not been updated. The solution should be letting toc depends on lyx2lyx Fixed (r24735). Basically speaking, toc was dependent on the existence of

lyx2lyx broken?

I get Warning: 332: Format not supported. When building TOC.lyx with scons: env_toc(["/usr/local/share/lyx16/doc/ru/TOC.lyx"], ["lib/doc/Customization.lyx", "lib/doc/EmbeddedObjects.lyx", "lib/doc/Extended.lyx", "lib/doc/ru/FAQ.lyx", "lib/doc/ru/Intro.lyx", "lib/doc/Math.lyx",

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

On Monday 12 May 2008 16:14:37 Bo Peng wrote: > I get > > Warning: 332: Format not supported. > > When building TOC.lyx with scons: > > env_toc(["/usr/local/share/lyx16/doc/ru/TOC.lyx"], > ["lib/doc/Customization.lyx", "lib/doc/EmbeddedObjects.lyx", > "lib/doc/Extended.lyx", "lib/doc/ru/FAQ.lyx",

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

> > lyx2lyx or something similar should be broken. > > Which version of python? 2.5.1 Bo

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

On Monday 12 May 2008 16:43:17 Bo Peng wrote: > > > lyx2lyx or something similar should be broken. > > > > Which version of python? > > 2.5.1 Me too, and it works here. What does ./lyx2lyx -l says? That it fails with that error message is strange because the last file format is 333. >

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

> Me too, and it works here. False alarm. Sorry. It seems to me that when I run scons in multi-thread mode, the TOC is built from system lyx2lyx, which has not been updated. The solution should be letting toc depends on lyx2lyx ... Cheers, Bo

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

> False alarm. Sorry. It seems to me that when I run scons in > multi-thread mode, the TOC is built from system lyx2lyx, which has not > been updated. The solution should be letting toc depends on lyx2lyx Fixed (r24735). Basically speaking, toc was dependent on the existence of

lyx2lyx broken?

I think lyx2lyx is currently broken. I can not open any old file, like help - FAQ. Can anyone confirm? Bo

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

On Monday 14 May 2007 23:45:02 Bo Peng wrote: I think lyx2lyx is currently broken. I can not open any old file, like help - FAQ. Can anyone confirm? OK. Got the problem. I will commit a fix immediately. Bo -- José Abílio

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

OK. Got the problem. I will commit a fix immediately. Thanks. I have also submitted a lyx2lyx patch for InsetListings. I think listings features are now complete and ready for beta 3 testing. Considering the time I spent on this feature, it would be much more cost-efficient to use ERT for

lyx2lyx broken?

I think lyx2lyx is currently broken. I can not open any old file, like help -> FAQ. Can anyone confirm? Bo

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

On Monday 14 May 2007 23:45:02 Bo Peng wrote: > I think lyx2lyx is currently broken. I can not open any old file, like > help -> FAQ. Can anyone confirm? OK. Got the problem. I will commit a fix immediately. > Bo -- José Abílio

Re: lyx2lyx broken?

OK. Got the problem. I will commit a fix immediately. Thanks. I have also submitted a lyx2lyx patch for InsetListings. I think listings features are now complete and ready for beta 3 testing. Considering the time I spent on this feature, it would be much more cost-efficient to use ERT for