There is a minor error with displaying the epsilon:
In an equation I can insert (of course) math symbols by (for example) typing
\rho and in the formula inside the lyx window a nice greek rho is displayed .
But when I do this for the greek \epsilon the latex code is not converted
into a greek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:43:00PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> The strange thing is when I try to insert an epsilon from within the math
> panel there is a greek epsilon available. So why isn't it displayed in the
> formula as well?
This is a \varepsilon.
However, \epsilon should be displayed
On Friday 26 April 2002 11:57 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:43:00PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > The strange thing is when I try to insert an epsilon from within the math
> > panel there is a greek epsilon available. So why isn't it displayed in
> > the formula as well?
>
On Friday 26 April 2002 12:57 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:43:00PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > The strange thing is when I try to insert an epsilon from within the math
> > panel there is a greek epsilon available. So why isn't it displayed in
> > the formula as well?
>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:11:57PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > However, \epsilon should be displayed as well. Do the other AMS symbols
> > show properly?
>
> I only have this problem with \epsilon although I didn't try them all.
> Symbols like \Delta \alpha \Gamma \psi etc display fine.
But th
On Friday 26 April 2002 1:10 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 26 April 2002 11:57 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:43:00PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > > The strange thing is when I try to insert an epsilon from within the
> > > math panel there is a greek epsilon avail
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:22:44PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> Still strangeis the \epsilon the only font not included in the
> default X fonts?
Look at the difference of \epsilon and \varepsilon. The glyph form th X
symbol font looks much closer to the latter, so we map it to \varepsilon
an
On Friday 26 April 2002 1:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:22:44PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > Still strangeis the \epsilon the only font not included in the
> > default X fonts?
>
> Look at the difference of \epsilon and \varepsilon. The glyph form th X
> symbol font
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:10:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 26 April 2002 11:57 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:43:00PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > > The strange thing is when I try to insert an epsilon from within the math
> > > panel there is a greek epsi
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:40:02PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> A big visual improvement, a small effort?
I don't know, I thought we once had some technically discussion that turned
up cases where this approach was not feasible. Can't remember which,
though, maybe I am even mis-remembering thi
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:03:04PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:40:02PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > A big visual improvement, a small effort?
>
> I don't know, I thought we once had some technically discussion that turned
> up cases where this approach was not fe
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:03:07PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:03:04PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:40:02PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > > A big visual improvement, a small effort?
> >
> > I don't know, I thought we once had some techni
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:03:04PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:40:02PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote: > A
>> big visual improvement, a small effort?
>>
>> I don't know, I thought we once had some technica
13 matches
Mail list logo
