Re: new WordPerfect, rtf and LyX

1998-12-21 Thread Amir Karger
On Sun, Dec 20, 1998 at 05:34:25PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: > On another note, in my upgrading quest, something trashed TeTeX-4 as I > was attempting to switch it to glibc. I ended up downloading the -9 > snapshot, and that fixed my problems and solved many others as well. The > texmf.cnf is m

Re: new WordPerfect, rtf and LyX

1998-12-20 Thread Garst R. Reese
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote: > WordPerfect is a threat to LyX because we have had the benefit of being > the only free, advanced word processor for Unix so far. Now we are > the underdogs. WordPerfect is simply much more advanced technology. > However, we still have relevance because we fil

Re: new WordPerfect, rtf and LyX

1998-12-18 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> There was talk about conflicting rtf file format standards here recently. > And I think the rtf->LaTeX effort was ended? > > Perhaps it would sense to look at the WordPerfect version of rtf. > WordPerfect could be the right go-between in converting Windows platform > documents. As I proposed e

Re: new WordPerfect, rtf and LyX

1998-12-17 Thread Garst R. Reese
"Larry S. Marso" wrote: > > There was talk about conflicting rtf file format standards here recently. > And I think the rtf->LaTeX effort was ended? > > Perhaps it would sense to look at the WordPerfect version of rtf. > WordPerfect could be the right go-between in converting Windows platform >

new WordPerfect, rtf and LyX

1998-12-17 Thread Larry S. Marso
There was talk about conflicting rtf file format standards here recently. And I think the rtf->LaTeX effort was ended? Perhaps it would sense to look at the WordPerfect version of rtf. WordPerfect could be the right go-between in converting Windows platform documents. Best regards -- Larry S. M