> | After removing the #pragma stuff it compiles! Is a patch without
> | > this ok?
>
> yes.
here it is...hopefully it can be applied. Thank you all for your help!
Ed.
preamble2.diff.gz
Just a guess from the docs
http://www.dis.com/gnu/gcc/gcc_108.html
but try moving the #pragma interface in FormPreamble.h
to *before* the #include "FormBase.h"
john
--
"Taste is predicated on discrimination."
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 12:20, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > I think the question to ask first is what's gone wrong with the #pragma
> > stuff.
>
> good question. I guess I must fail this test.
Not important.
> > When you come to submit the patch, could you also s
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> that was already in the patch i send in.
> how should I proceed?
>
> thanks, ed.
Your patch seems to be missing ripping out of preamble
from layout_forms.fd
Also,
Index: src/frontends/xforms/forms/form
> I think the question to ask first is what's gone wrong with the #pragma
> stuff.
good question. I guess I must fail this test.
> When you come to submit the patch, could you also strip out the old
> preamble form from the ./forms directory. (In layout_forms.[fd,h.patch]
th
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Just to point out I get the same problem. I admit I'd not thought of the
| > pragma stuff. Edwin, try removing the #pragma implementation/interface
| > stuff from the header and source file. I don't know why this would help
| > (given all the others wo
is would help
> > (given all the others work OK) but it's worth a shot.
>
> After removing the #pragma stuff it compiles! Is a patch without this ok?
>
> Thanks, Ed.
I think the question to ask first is what's gone wrong with the #pragma stuff.
When you come to sub
> Just to point out I get the same problem. I admit I'd not thought of the
> pragma stuff. Edwin, try removing the #pragma implementation/interface
> stuff from the header and source file. I don't know why this would help
> (given all the others work OK) but it's worth a shot.
After removing the
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > This code compiles perfectly for me on a DEC Alpha running
> > DEC cxx -strict_ansi
> > Perhaps your compiler (g++?) got confused! Why not "make clean" in the
> > xforms directory and try again. In the past, similar messages have been
> > resolved by c
> This code compiles perfectly for me on a DEC Alpha running
> DEC cxx -strict_ansi
> Perhaps your compiler (g++?) got confused! Why not "make clean" in the
> xforms directory and try again. In the past, similar messages have been
> resolved by correct #pragma directives, but I'm no expert here.
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 20 February 2001 10:03, Angus Leeming wrote:
| > On Tuesday 20 February 2001 09:55, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > > Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > >
| > > | Hi, I am trying to move the late
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 10:03, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2001 09:55, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | Hi, I am trying to move the latex preamble to the guii xforms dir.
During
> > |
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 09:55, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi, I am trying to move the latex preamble to the guii xforms dir. During
> | linking I get the following error message:
>
> You are probably missing an inher
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi, I am trying to move the latex preamble to the guii xforms dir. During
| linking I get the following error message:
You are probably missing an inheritance from SigC::Object somewhere.
Lgb
Hi, I am trying to move the latex preamble to the guii xforms dir. During
linking I get the following error message:
../src/frontends/xforms/.libs/libxforms.a(FormPreamble.o): In function
`SigC::ObjectSlot0_::callback(void *)':
/usr/include/g++-2/std/bastring.cc(.text+0x10e): unde
>>>>> "U" == U Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
U> In write protected documents it is currently not possible to scroll
U> the latex preamble. I think this should be enabled.
Unfortunaltey, it seems that it is not possible to keep scrollbars
when disabl
In write protected documents it is currently not possible to scroll the latex
preamble. I think this should be enabled.
--
Ulrich Günther
changing preamble?
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>
> Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Update dvi does not
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Update dvi does not trigger an update of the dvi file when the latex
| preamble is changed. An example of this behavior is given by
| redefining the date command in the letter text-class.
Version of LyX?
| BTW:
| 1. Why is the default behav
Hello,
Update dvi does not trigger an update of the dvi file when the latex
preamble is changed. An example of this behavior is given by
redefining the date command in the letter text-class.
BTW:
1. Why is the default behavior to insert today's date? One should be
forced to give the
501 - 520 of 520 matches
Mail list logo
