Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-14 Thread José Matos
On Friday 13 November 2009 13:21:36 rgheck wrote: Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have LaTeX, then export to DVI will not be available. Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're right about the outlines of the thing. Is there a

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-14 Thread José Matos
On Friday 13 November 2009 13:21:36 rgheck wrote: > Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have LaTeX, > then export to DVI will not be available. > > Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're > right about the outlines of the thing. > > Is there

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes: So far as I can see, the graph itself does not depend in any way upon the document class (see Converters::buildGraph()). Yes. If we don't have LaTeX installed, then we won't get DVI as an export option, because we lack a LaTeX--DVI converter. But we still

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-13 Thread rgheck
On 11/13/2009 06:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: rgheckrgh...@bobjweil.com writes: So far as I can see, the graph itself does not depend in any way upon the document class (see Converters::buildGraph()). Yes. If we don't have LaTeX installed, then we won't get DVI as an

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes: Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have LaTeX, then export to DVI will not be available. Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're right about the outlines of the thing. Is there a corresponding thing for

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck writes: > So far as I can see, the graph itself does not depend in any way upon > the document class (see Converters::buildGraph()). Yes. > If we don't have LaTeX installed, then we won't get DVI as an export > option, because we lack a LaTeX-->DVI converter. But we

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-13 Thread rgheck
On 11/13/2009 06:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: rgheck writes: So far as I can see, the graph itself does not depend in any way upon the document class (see Converters::buildGraph()). Yes. If we don't have LaTeX installed, then we won't get DVI as an

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck writes: > Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have > LaTeX, then export to DVI will not be available. > > Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're > right about the outlines of the thing. > > Is there a corresponding

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-11 Thread rgheck
On 11/10/2009 09:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: rgheckrgh...@bobjweil.com writes: Richard, it is nice to see you working on that. One thing that would be nice is to be able to have the graph depend on the document, or rather of its class: this would allow to handle unsupported classes,

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-11 Thread rgheck
On 11/10/2009 09:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: rgheck writes: Richard, it is nice to see you working on that. One thing that would be nice is to be able to have the graph depend on the document, or rather of its class: this would allow to handle unsupported

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes: Richard, it is nice to see you working on that. One thing that would be nice is to be able to have the graph depend on the document, or rather of its class: this would allow to handle unsupported classes, which can currently not be output at all. We should be

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck writes: >> Richard, it is nice to see you working on that. One thing that would be >> nice is to be able to have the graph depend on the document, or rather >> of its class: this would allow to handle unsupported classes, which can >> currently not be output at all. We

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgh...@lyx.org writes: Author: rgheck Date: Mon Nov 9 05:02:45 2009 New Revision: 31917 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31917 Log: Move the visited stuff inside the Vertex struct. Also, there is no good reason for the vertices_ member to be static. Indeed, if we wanted to use

Re: r31917 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-11-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgh...@lyx.org writes: > Author: rgheck > Date: Mon Nov 9 05:02:45 2009 > New Revision: 31917 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31917 > > Log: > Move the visited stuff inside the Vertex struct. > Also, there is no good reason for the vertices_ member to be static. Indeed, > if we wanted