On Friday 13 November 2009 13:21:36 rgheck wrote:
Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have LaTeX,
then export to DVI will not be available.
Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're
right about the outlines of the thing.
Is there a
On Friday 13 November 2009 13:21:36 rgheck wrote:
> Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have LaTeX,
> then export to DVI will not be available.
>
> Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're
> right about the outlines of the thing.
>
> Is there
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes:
So far as I can see, the graph itself does not depend in any way upon
the document class (see Converters::buildGraph()).
Yes.
If we don't have LaTeX installed, then we won't get DVI as an export
option, because we lack a LaTeX--DVI converter. But we still
On 11/13/2009 06:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheckrgh...@bobjweil.com writes:
So far as I can see, the graph itself does not depend in any way upon
the document class (see Converters::buildGraph()).
Yes.
If we don't have LaTeX installed, then we won't get DVI as an
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes:
Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have
LaTeX, then export to DVI will not be available.
Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're
right about the outlines of the thing.
Is there a corresponding thing for
rgheck writes:
> So far as I can see, the graph itself does not depend in any way upon
> the document class (see Converters::buildGraph()).
Yes.
> If we don't have LaTeX installed, then we won't get DVI as an export
> option, because we lack a LaTeX-->DVI converter. But we
On 11/13/2009 06:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheck writes:
So far as I can see, the graph itself does not depend in any way upon
the document class (see Converters::buildGraph()).
Yes.
If we don't have LaTeX installed, then we won't get DVI as an
rgheck writes:
> Oh, I see. I was concentrating on the fact that, if we don't have
> LaTeX, then export to DVI will not be available.
>
> Now that I see the issue, I think this is easy enough to do. You're
> right about the outlines of the thing.
>
> Is there a corresponding
On 11/10/2009 09:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheckrgh...@bobjweil.com writes:
Richard, it is nice to see you working on that. One thing that would be
nice is to be able to have the graph depend on the document, or rather
of its class: this would allow to handle unsupported classes,
On 11/10/2009 09:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheck writes:
Richard, it is nice to see you working on that. One thing that would be
nice is to be able to have the graph depend on the document, or rather
of its class: this would allow to handle unsupported
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes:
Richard, it is nice to see you working on that. One thing that would be
nice is to be able to have the graph depend on the document, or rather
of its class: this would allow to handle unsupported classes, which can
currently not be output at all. We should be
rgheck writes:
>> Richard, it is nice to see you working on that. One thing that would be
>> nice is to be able to have the graph depend on the document, or rather
>> of its class: this would allow to handle unsupported classes, which can
>> currently not be output at all. We
rgh...@lyx.org writes:
Author: rgheck
Date: Mon Nov 9 05:02:45 2009
New Revision: 31917
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31917
Log:
Move the visited stuff inside the Vertex struct.
Also, there is no good reason for the vertices_ member to be static. Indeed,
if we wanted to use
rgh...@lyx.org writes:
> Author: rgheck
> Date: Mon Nov 9 05:02:45 2009
> New Revision: 31917
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31917
>
> Log:
> Move the visited stuff inside the Vertex struct.
> Also, there is no good reason for the vertices_ member to be static. Indeed,
> if we wanted
14 matches
Mail list logo