On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
2. For the next version of LyX, we should implement better handling of
multi-part document: each document should know who is its parent.
For example, suppose that you have master.lyx which includes child-1.lyx,
child-2.lyx and child-3.lyx.
When you
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:13:04PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
2. For the next version of LyX, we should implement better handling of
multi-part document: each document should know who is its parent.
For example, suppose that you have master.lyx
On Friday 21 September 2001 18:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
angus ambled,
I think that's the best way, yes.
Done. Check it out.
ahh, much better.
Thanks (from whomever reads my paper as well :)
Is it possible to make the selection window on the
left retain its position
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> 2. For the next version of LyX, we should implement better handling of
> multi-part document: each document should know who is its parent.
> For example, suppose that you have master.lyx which includes child-1.lyx,
> child-2.lyx and child-3.lyx.
> When
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:13:04PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > 2. For the next version of LyX, we should implement better handling of
> > multi-part document: each document should know who is its parent.
> > For example, suppose that you have
On Friday 21 September 2001 18:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> angus ambled,
>
>
> > > I think that's the best way, yes.
>
> > Done. Check it out.
>
> ahh, much better.
>
> Thanks (from whomever reads my paper as well :)
>
> Is it possible to make the selection window on the
> left retain
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I think that it's important to the interface that similar
functions behaive similalrly (unless overridden by user-specified
preferences). Having citations and references handled differently is
kind of bizarre . . .
This is good
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:53:13AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
This is good opportunity to plead (once again) for handling multipart
documents identically in the citation and cross reference dialog. IMHO the
citation ref dialog should have a buffer field such as the cross reference
dialog -
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 12:57:15PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
In contrast, when inserting a label in child-1.lyx, lyx will offer to list
the labels of either master.lyx, child-1.lyx (default), child-2.lyx,
child-3.lyx, or all labels.
Note that we don't want to always list all labels as
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, I think that it's important to the interface that similar
> functions behaive similalrly (unless overridden by user-specified
> preferences). Having citations and references handled differently is
> kind of bizarre . . .
This is good
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:53:13AM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> This is good opportunity to plead (once again) for handling multipart
> documents identically in the citation and cross reference dialog. IMHO the
> citation ref dialog should have a buffer field such as the cross reference
>
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 12:57:15PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > In contrast, when inserting a label in child-1.lyx, lyx will offer to list
> > the labels of either master.lyx, child-1.lyx (default), child-2.lyx,
> > child-3.lyx, or all labels.
> > Note that we don't want to always list all
On Friday 21 September 2001 16:23, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
After inserting or modifying a reference with Apply rather than
Close, and then moving the cursor to insert another, the first reference
is modified. This is confusing behavior (and took me a couple of
minutes to figure out.
On Friday 21 September 2001 16:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that's the best way, yes.
Done. Check it out.
A
On Friday 21 September 2001 16:23, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> After inserting or modifying a reference with Apply rather than
> Close, and then moving the cursor to insert another, the first reference
> is modified. This is confusing behavior (and took me a couple of
> minutes to figure out.
On Friday 21 September 2001 16:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think that's the best way, yes.
Done. Check it out.
A
16 matches
Mail list logo
