Re: shared modules with lyx.

1999-12-06 Thread Arnd Hanses
On Sun, 05 Dec 1999 21:01:48 +, Duncan Simpson wrote: cc'ed to LyX-list, because it's about LyX design: > > >> >Depending on the blocking or shared memory properties of vfork() is guaranteed >> >to burn you on at least one of the unicies out there. >> >> ? You mean older bsd clones would

Re: shared modules with lyx.

1999-12-04 Thread Arnd Hanses
On 25 Nov 1999 02:48:49 +0100, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote: >| Well, in the old dll version I had to export some uninitialized >| globals, what I did not like. > >Do you have a list of them? We should not have uninitialized globals. Unfortunately I did not keep a list. I think 1.0.4 finally got ri

Re: shared modules with lyx.

1999-11-28 Thread Shigeru Miyata
Sorry that I could not answer earlier. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bj$Bxn(Jnes) wrote: > btw. did you try --enable-shared on OS/2? How severly did it bomb? The very first attempt build LyX flawlessly, and then I found there are no DLL's made but static libraries. I checked config/ltconfig

Re: shared modules with lyx.

1999-11-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This is more or less what I want. It might even be better to have a | default setup where libtool isn't involved at all, i.e. only | --enable-shared would call libtool. That complicates the Makefile.am's so if it is not needed I won't do it. | > Also,

Re: shared modules with lyx.

1999-11-24 Thread Arnd Hanses
On 24 Nov 1999 20:35:05 +0100, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote: >| You can use the EMXEXP tool to export all global functions and all >| initialized global variables. >| (And even the uninitialized, but this is often problematic: Please >| initialize ALL global variables to a completely defined state

Re: shared modules with lyx.

1999-11-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | It lacks some linker flags which are necessary or useful, e.g. the | INITINSTANCE TERMINSTANCE (of uninitialized static variables) and DATA | MULTIPLE NONSHARED flags, it does not provide for suitable HEAPSIZE and | STACKSIZE statements. Moreover I

Re: shared modules with lyx.

1999-11-24 Thread Arnd Hanses
On 23 Nov 1999 15:45:47 +0100, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote: > >The "experimental" use of libtool works for linux, and I have not seen >any failure reports from other archs yet. > >I suspect that when libtool is used in "static" mode as it is now, we >should not have large problems on any system. Ho

shared modules with lyx.

1999-11-23 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
The "experimental" use of libtool works for linux, and I have not seen any failure reports from other archs yet. I suspect that when libtool is used in "static" mode as it is now, we should not have large problems on any system. However I'd like to see "shared" support also tested. Configure wi