Re: so many core dumps

2001-10-26 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:05:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The crash was worse than I thought: For the first time in 3 (4?) > years, I lost data. The emergency save version was just plain wrong; yikes, this is really horrible. Of course, the standard disclaimer about CVS versions a

Re: so many core dumps

2001-10-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:05:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At least I'd previewed in ghostview and got a .ps file out of it. > > Anyone know how to go back from .ps to .tex??? No way I am afraid. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: so many core dumps

2001-10-28 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:05:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Anyone know how to go back from .ps to .tex??? > > No way I am afraid. Well, in worst case you can always try to print it, and then OCR it. A bit easier is to convert the ps to pd

Re: so many core dumps

2001-10-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:46:46AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > Well, in worst case you can always try to print it, and then OCR it. > > A bit easier is to convert the ps to pdf, and then try Adobe Acrobat > and copy/paste it. It sometimes work. Note that he had two pages of math. I

Re: so many core dumps

2001-10-29 Thread Herbert Voss
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:05:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Anyone know how to go back from .ps to .tex??? > > > > No way I am afraid. > > Well, in worst case you can always try to print it, and t

Re: so many core dumps

2001-10-29 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:46:46AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:05:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Anyone know how to go back from .ps to .tex??? > > > > No way I am afraid. > > Well, in worst case