Re: src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am

2002-02-14 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:34:15PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Yes. That was what I said needed doing in the later part of my email. What is supposed to go wrong? It seems to work as I would expect make to work when I remove it -- ie. libqt2.a is rebuilt when the xforms stuff changes. If

Re: src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am

2002-02-14 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:34:15PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > Yes. That was what I said needed doing in the later part of my email. > What is supposed to go wrong? It seems to work as I would expect make > to work when I remove it -- ie. libqt2.a is rebuilt when the xforms > stuff changes. If

Re: src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am

2002-02-13 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:20:27AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Why do we have libqt2_la_DEPENDENCIES? have you tried removing it ? john -- I'd rather be rudely informed than politely left in the dark.

Re: src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am

2002-02-13 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, John Levon wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:20:27AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: Why do we have libqt2_la_DEPENDENCIES? have you tried removing it ? Yes. That was what I said needed doing in the later part of my email. What is supposed to go wrong? It seems to work as I

Re: src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am

2002-02-13 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:20:27AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > Why do we have libqt2_la_DEPENDENCIES? have you tried removing it ? john -- "I'd rather be rudely informed than politely left in the dark."

Re: src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am

2002-02-13 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:20:27AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > Why do we have libqt2_la_DEPENDENCIES? > > have you tried removing it ? Yes. That was what I said needed doing in the later part of my email. What is supposed to go wrong? It seems to

src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am

2002-02-12 Thread Allan Rae
Why do we have libqt2_la_DEPENDENCIES? Its presense restricts the dependencies and means that when one of the xforms dialogs that is added in libqt2_la_LIBADD changes libqt2 is _not_ rebuilt. So as a result you are not getting up-to-date xforms code into the qt2-frontended LyX. Removing that

src/frontends/qt2/Makefile.am

2002-02-12 Thread Allan Rae
Why do we have libqt2_la_DEPENDENCIES? Its presense restricts the dependencies and means that when one of the xforms dialogs that is added in libqt2_la_LIBADD changes libqt2 is _not_ rebuilt. So as a result you are not getting up-to-date xforms code into the qt2-frontended LyX. Removing that

Re: src/frontends/qt2/*/Makefile.am

2001-10-02 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote: src/frontends/qt2/{,ui/}Makefile.am define twice DISTCLEANFILES, the first one seeming unnecessary. coo, do they ? Also, src/frontends/qt2/ui/moc/Makefile.am contains a strange #$(patsubst, %, %Dialog_moc.C, $(DIALOGS))

Re: src/frontends/qt2/*/Makefile.am

2001-10-02 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote: > src/frontends/qt2/{,ui/}Makefile.am define twice DISTCLEANFILES, the first > one seeming unnecessary. coo, do they ? > Also, src/frontends/qt2/ui/moc/Makefile.am contains a strange > #$(patsubst, %, %Dialog_moc.C,

src/frontends/qt2/*/Makefile.am

2001-10-01 Thread Yves Bastide
src/frontends/qt2/{,ui/}Makefile.am define twice DISTCLEANFILES, the first one seeming unnecessary. Also, src/frontends/qt2/ui/moc/Makefile.am contains a strange #$(patsubst, %, %Dialog_moc.C, $(DIALOGS)) line (no harm done anyway) -- Yves

src/frontends/qt2/*/Makefile.am

2001-10-01 Thread Yves Bastide
src/frontends/qt2/{,ui/}Makefile.am define twice DISTCLEANFILES, the first one seeming unnecessary. Also, src/frontends/qt2/ui/moc/Makefile.am contains a strange #$(patsubst, %, %Dialog_moc.C, $(DIALOGS)) line (no harm done anyway) -- Yves