Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 15. November 2015 um 19:03:01, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
>> Nice, but a pity that it is not python;-( Many years ago it was decided
>> that all scripts should be python, and everything was converted.
>
> We do not provide perl scripts, but de
Am Sonntag, 15. November 2015 um 19:03:01, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, 13. November 2015 um 20:18:46, schrieb Georg Baum
> >
> >>
> >> I am tempted to write our own merge tool in python..
> >
> > I have a script ready, though it is perl.
>
> Nice, but a pity tha
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 13. November 2015 um 20:18:46, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>>
>> I am tempted to write our own merge tool in python..
>
> I have a script ready, though it is perl.
Nice, but a pity that it is not python;-( Many years ago it was decided that
all scripts should be pyth
Am Freitag, 13. November 2015 um 20:18:46, schrieb Georg Baum
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > This would be nice. If the only way to do things is with manual merging,
> > I'm happy to spend the time to learn how to do that. But if you think it
> > is possible to come up with a script that either
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> This would be nice. If the only way to do things is with manual merging,
> I'm happy to spend the time to learn how to do that. But if you think it
> is possible to come up with a script that either does the merging
> automatically or at least facilitates the merging, then
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:27:48PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 13/11/2015 16:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:12:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >>Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>
> >>>Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Branch has less strings than
Le 13/11/2015 16:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:12:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all
strings from branch are common with master.
I
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:12:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >>> Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all
> >>> strings from branch are common with master.
> >>
> >> I see. So there is no rul
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>> Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all
>>> strings from branch are common with master.
>>
>> I see. So there is no rule that I can use to do what I want then. I
>> guess I will just copy over
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:29:19PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Or is there another source of chaos?
>
> Unfortunately it is. It is called 'remerge of strings' when no new
> translations are added
> but po files are made up-to-date with the current source code.
> So if y
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Or is there another source of chaos?
Unfortunately it is. It is called 'remerge of strings' when no new translations
are added
but po files are made up-to-date with the current source code.
So if you have remerge in master all po files get touched although no new
transla
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:14:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >>Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all strings
> >>from branch
> >>are common with master.
> >
> >I see. So there is no rule that I can use to do what
Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all strings from
branch
are common with master.
I see. So there is no rule that I can use to do what I want then. I
guess I will just copy over the po files from branch that have not been
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:56:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:59:39, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:14:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> > >
> > > > On Wed,
Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:59:39, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:14:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52:43AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > Scott Kostys
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:14:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52:43AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with
Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:14:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52:43AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with the branch
> > > po files, but it seems there are changes in the trunk p
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52:43AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with the branch
> > po files, but it seems there are changes in the trunk po files that are
> > not in branch (e.g. a73c2647). So what is the procedure f
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with the branch
> po files, but it seems there are changes in the trunk po files that are
> not in branch (e.g. a73c2647). So what is the procedure for this?
This is somewhat chaotic territory, you can't be really sur
I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with the branch
po files, but it seems there are changes in the trunk po files that are
not in branch (e.g. a73c2647). So what is the procedure for this?
Scott
20 matches
Mail list logo
