Re: texlive as support for lyx

abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? I have been using LyX with texlive for half a year now.

Re: texlive as support for lyx

abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? I have been using LyX with texlive for half a year now.

texlive as support for lyx

Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? thanks for help best regards bela

Re: texlive as support for lyx

On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:38:41AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? AFAIK LyX works

texlive as support for lyx

Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? thanks for help best regards bela

Re: texlive as support for lyx

On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:38:41AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote: > Hi, > since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of > tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. > [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? AFAIK LyX