Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I don't mean by using a script but rather by mathed's "native" I/O.
I understood. However, you talked about "replace '\[' by '\[%\n '".
I was pointing out that it looks like that case is handled already.
Instead running a lyx 1.3.x file through the script replaced 'foo\['
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:24:22AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > It would be cheap and 'harmless' to replace '\[' by '\[%\n ' etc
> > from within LyX.
> >
> > Should I do that?
>
> I think that happens already. Here's an example of what the script I
> posted did on stuf
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> It would be cheap and 'harmless' to replace '\[' by '\[%\n ' etc
> from within LyX.
>
> Should I do that?
I think that happens already. Here's an example of what the script I
posted did on stuff exported from lyx 1.3.x:
mass to be conserved, this mass increase must be b
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:03:44AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> > 2) Instead of including latex beautifying code into LyX, I suggest
> > an independent script is used to do the work. The benefits are
> > obvious. It won't introduce bugs into LyX. It won't have any impact
> > o
Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> 2) Instead of including latex beautifying code into LyX, I suggest
> an independent script is used to do the work. The benefits are
> obvious. It won't introduce bugs into LyX. It won't have any impact
> on people who don't want the latex code. It may be less efficient to
> gen
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:15:03AM -0600, Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> I did and got the same result. It is a little bit wierd. Latex is
> more or less like a programming language, but no one writes a
> beautifying script for it.
I guess that's simply because (La)TeX syntax is highly convoluted if not
mes
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:24:14PM -0600, Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
> notes. It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of latex
> code. However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting papers to
> journals. Th
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Huaiyu Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugly latex code
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:40:50 +0100
I think that there are a lot of small things we could do to improve
the output of equations. However,
> "Huaiyu" == Huaiyu Duan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Huaiyu> Hi, I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write
Huaiyu> short technical notes. It really saves time for me againts
Huaiyu> checking the grammar of latex code. However, there is a
Huaiyu> problem when it comes to submiting
- Original Message -
From: "Helge Hafting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Huaiyu Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: ugly latex code
> Huaiyu Duan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
Huaiyu Duan wrote:
Hi,
I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical
notes. It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of
latex code. However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting
papers to journals. The equation part of the latex code exported by
Hi,
I use LyX a lot to document what I have done or write short technical notes.
It really saves time for me againts checking the grammar of latex code.
However, there is a problem when it comes to submiting papers to journals.
The equation part of the latex code exported by LyX is really ugly
12 matches
Mail list logo
