On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 27/11/13 19:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
findadv-re-05-in.txt: FAILED
findadv-re-06-in.txt: Ok
>> Tommaso, is this test failure a regression or a bug in the test? Is it
>> on your ra
On 27/11/13 19:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> findadv-re-05-in.txt: FAILED
>>> findadv-re-06-in.txt: Ok
>>>
> Tommaso, is this test failure a regression or a bug in the test? Is it
> on your radar to fix? Should the test be removed?
AFAICR, it a case working
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> On 13/11/13 02:10, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>>> On 12/11/13 22:26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 27/10/13 08:17
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 13/11/13 02:10, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> On 12/11/13 22:26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 27/10/13 08:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> Tommaso,
>
> I also
On 13/11/13 02:10, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 12/11/13 22:26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>>> On 27/10/13 08:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Tommaso,
I also have findadv-re-05 failing. Does it fail for you?
>>>
>>>
>>> Just
On 12/11/13 22:26, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> On 27/10/13 08:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>>
>>> Tommaso,
>>>
>>> I also have findadv-re-05 failing. Does it fail for you?
>>
>>
>> Just upgraded to 13.10, let's see if I can still compile :-)
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 27/10/13 08:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> Tommaso,
>>
>> I also have findadv-re-05 failing. Does it fail for you?
>
>
> Just upgraded to 13.10, let's see if I can still compile :-)...
Just a reminder :)
Scott
On 27/10/13 08:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Tommaso,
I also have findadv-re-05 failing. Does it fail for you?
Just upgraded to 13.10, let's see if I can still compile :-)...
T.
gt;
>
>> Now the regexp insets entered in Advanced F&R search/replace boxes do
>> not preview anymore independently, unless embedded/nested within other math
>> elements.
>
>> Fixing crash as described in #7805.
>
>>
>
>
>
> Thanks T
> preview anymore independently, unless embedded/nested within other math
> elements.
> Fixing crash as described in #7805.
>
Thanks Tommaso.
Now all but one findadv test are playing nice.
The following tests FAILED:
166 - keytest/findadv-re-05 (Faile
Pressing F7 or using tools->spellchecker brings up a blank spellcheck
window. If the document is correctly spelt, then the "x words checked"
box comes up, and the dialog remains blank. blank, or even not-filled-in
, i.e. the window manager draws a frame and inside it some old screen
contents st
Sorry guys I blew away that machine yesterday and can't reproduce this
under OpenSUSE 10.2 - also the requirement for prettyref.sty seems to be
gone?? Unless it's really there but hidden.
Have fun,
Darre
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 09:23 -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> Can you get a backtr
Can you get a backtrace from this? Just run it under gdb. It'll help if
you compile with -enable-debug.
Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 01:48, Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Darren Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have a Mandrake 10.0 (gasp!) machine which I just built LyX
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 01:48, Richard Heck wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a Mandrake 10.0 (gasp!) machine which I just built LyX (latest
> > svn) on with Qt 4.2.3 compiled from source also. What follows also
> > applied to earlier svn and earlier Qt, I tried rebuilding eve
Darren Freeman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Mandrake 10.0 (gasp!) machine which I just built LyX (latest
> svn) on with Qt 4.2.3 compiled from source also. What follows also
> applied to earlier svn and earlier Qt, I tried rebuilding everything
> with latest versions out of confusion.
>
> When I r
Hi all,
I have a Mandrake 10.0 (gasp!) machine which I just built LyX (latest
svn) on with Qt 4.2.3 compiled from source also. What follows also
applied to earlier svn and earlier Qt, I tried rebuilding everything
with latest versions out of confusion.
When I run it as src/lyx from the build tree
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Well as you said * Basically *. As Garst pointed out candian
Juergen> is not supported by babel (or was it canadien the french
Juergen> version), while there exits dictionaries for this. Now while
Juergen> we could use the righ
On 26-Sep-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Basically, the names we use are the babel names already. So what do
> you want exactly?
Well as you said * Basically *. As Garst pointed out candian is not
supported by babel (or was it canadien the french version), while there
exits dictionaries for
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 26-Sep-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I am currently fiddling with the xforms menu code and do not have
>> much time. Moreover my babel is a bit old.
>>
Juergen> Well I meant the output of this to the .tex file from
On 26-Sep-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I am currently fiddling with the xforms menu code and do not have much
> time. Moreover my babel is a bit old.
>
Well I meant the output of this to the .tex file from within LyX,
but ok I will have a look at this and try to fix it.
Jürgen
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc you are more handy with the babel code could you
Juergen> have a look, I will insert you another field babel in the
Juergen> Language.[Ch] files if you cannot do that yourself.
I am currently fiddling with the xforms
On 26-Sep-2000 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> The reason I used "American" is that Aspell points english to a short
> American
> dictionary.
Well we still use ispell as default!
> Did you notice that french spell canadian canadien and so did I.
> ^
I
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 25-Sep-2000 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > I'm not sure when this problem crept in because I have not printed
> > anything for a few days now.
> > I guess, however, it is related to changes I made in language.C
>
> I did not see that you removed english from the language f
On 25-Sep-2000 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I'm not sure when this problem crept in because I have not printed
> anything for a few days now.
> I guess, however, it is related to changes I made in language.C
I did not see that you removed english from the language file, otherwise
I would have put it
I'm not sure when this problem crept in because I have not printed
anything for a few days now.
I guess, however, it is related to changes I made in language.C
If I select anything besides english, I get ps errors telling me I have
not selected english. I added back the english entry in language.
unless I see some objections I will begin to remove code that is dead
because of USE_OSTREAM_ONLY today.
Lgb
26 matches
Mail list logo
