Mike == Mike Ressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike After I finish proofing the
Mike current docs, I plan to declare them set in stone for any
Mike possible 1.1.6fix3.
When is that scheduled to happen?
JMarc
Mike == Mike Ressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike For the devvies who may be lurking here - is the 1.2.0 CVS
Mike stable enough to use to start documenting 1.2.0 specific
Mike features? Or am I better off waiting a bit until Lars declares a
Mike true code freeze?
Some things are bound to
On 18 Jul 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Mike == Mike Ressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike After I finish proofing the
Mike current docs, I plan to declare them set in stone for any
Mike possible 1.1.6fix3.
When is that scheduled to happen?
If I can get them off my laptop, I have
> "Mike" == Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> After I finish proofing the
Mike> current docs, I plan to declare them set in stone for any
Mike> possible 1.1.6fix3.
When is that scheduled to happen?
JMarc
> "Mike" == Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> For the devvies who may be lurking here - is the 1.2.0 CVS
Mike> stable enough to use to start documenting 1.2.0 specific
Mike> features? Or am I better off waiting a bit until Lars declares a
Mike> true code freeze?
Some things
On 18 Jul 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Mike" == Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike> After I finish proofing the
> Mike> current docs, I plan to declare them set in stone for any
> Mike> possible 1.1.6fix3.
>
> When is that scheduled to happen?
If I can get them off my
