OTOH, if you're really serious about taking on updating the docs, Uwe,
I have some suggestions.
First, see where we've been. I've written copious bytes describing
the design and goals of the docs. It'd be foolish not to look at
that. Wanna know why some part of the docs is the way it is? Ask m
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:20:49PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, John Weiss wrote:
>
> > Use a separate doc and include it via a master doc.
>
> I was thinking about that. Other than the book will have a lot of
> redundant information.
Yes, that is a problem, isn't it?
> >
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:34:24AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> John Weiss wrote:
>
> >Doesn't follow a structured concept, eh?
> >Maybe you should read the mailling list archives before insulting me.
>
> Sorry I wouldn't harm anybody. I didn't know that there is an active doc
> maintainer. I asked
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:07:27AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Uwe> John Weiss wrote:
> >> Doesn't follow a strucutred concept, eh? Maybe you should read the
> >> mailling list archives before insulting me.
>
> Uwe> Sorry I wouldn'
Recent wiki posts:
(http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Main/AllRecentChanges)
* http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/FAQ/MacInstall - 16:13 14/01 by Anders Ekberg
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, John Weiss wrote:
> PHEW! Thanks Christian. It's a relief to know that I don't need to
> rewrite all of those emails... again...
Umm.. I just put a copy of that particular mail, but if you can give me a
pointer to other relevant mails in the archives I could add them as we
John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Uwe:
>
| For future reference:
>
| When I was working on this 7 years ago, I added various ERT to ensure
| a good-looking print version. (I proofread the "print" version using
| ghostscript or xdvi back then.) Of course, someone probably decided
| to "be
