Ran Rutenberg schrieb:
Can I commit it?:
Of course - that's what I wished.
But as we are in release freeze, I needed 2 OKs before. I interprete mine, Bo, and Martin as OK, so
I put it in and also corrected the wrong "he" prefix:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18420
http://www.lyx.org/tr
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:27:12AM +, Ran Rutenberg wrote:
> On 5/19/07, Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Can I commit it?:
>
> Of course - that's what I wished.
>
>
> >Ran, one question: Is it necessary to use the same note behind the
> >word "LyX"?
>
> Unfortunately, yes. There is
All recent posts: http://wiki.lyx.org/Site/AllRecentChanges
* http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX.NewInLyX15 . . . 2007-05-19 08:03 CEST by jspitzm
* http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX.LaTeX . . . 2007-05-19 16:39 CEST by Steve Litt
* http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX.LaTeX . . . 2007-05-19 16:41 CEST by Steve Litt
On 5/19/07, Eran Kaplinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great translation!
May I offer a couple of refinements that make the splash screen gender
neutral?
Thanks for the refinements. Although in Hebrew writing in masculine grammar form
is common with Eran's refinements we can be more political
BTW, I think we absolutely MUST someday (TM) to include an explicit
paragraph direction setting. Having the user to read documentation and
ignoring the current defacto standard is not an option.
On 5/20/07, Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:27:12AM +, Ran Rutenberg wrote:
On 5/19/07, Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can I commit it?:
Of course - that's what I wished.
Ran, one question: Is it necessary to use the same note behind the
word "LyX"?
Unfortunately, yes. There
Elazar Leibovich wrote:
BTW, I think we absolutely MUST someday (TM) to include an explicit
paragraph direction setting. Having the user to read documentation and
ignoring the current defacto standard is not an option.
I opened a bugzilla request, see
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 01:21:17AM +0300, Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> BTW, I think we absolutely MUST someday (TM) to include an
> explicit
> paragraph direction setting. Having the user to read
> documentation and
> ignoring the current defacto standard is not an option.
Yes, I agree. The current
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 01:44:55AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> >BTW, I think we absolutely MUST someday (TM) to include an
> >explicit
> >paragraph direction setting. Having the user to read
> >documentation and
> >ignoring the current defacto standard is not an option
