Re: "Tabular"/"Tabular Material" vs. "Table"

2002-07-05 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote: > Now that floating figures and tables have been moved off into their own > submenu (Insert->Floats->Table), this isn't so big a deal anymore, but > then people will ask "What's the difference between Insert->Table and > Insert->Floats

Re: "Tabular"/"Tabular Material" vs. "Table"

2002-06-24 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote: > So, I'm in favor of renaming it if a consistent, non-ambiguous solution > can be found. Keep in mind the fact that if one inserts a > Insert->Floats->Table, one then needs to insert a Insert->Table into it. > That's a bit too ambi

Re: "Tabular"/"Tabular Material" vs. "Table"

2002-06-24 Thread Mike Ressler
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, robin wrote: > John Levon wrote: > >JMarc suggested I ask here about this terminology. My question is, what > >is our justificatino for exposing the user to the unusual formulation > >"Tabular Material", or the even worse "Tabular" ? > > > Beats me. This is another of those

Re: "Tabular"/"Tabular Material" vs. "Table"

2002-06-21 Thread robin
John Levon wrote: >JMarc suggested I ask here about this terminology. My question is, what >is our justificatino for exposing the user to the unusual formulation >"Tabular Material", or the even worse "Tabular" ? > Beats me. > > >What are the problems with using "Table" everywhere throughout the

"Tabular"/"Tabular Material" vs. "Table"

2002-06-20 Thread John Levon
JMarc suggested I ask here about this terminology. My question is, what is our justificatino for exposing the user to the unusual formulation "Tabular Material", or the even worse "Tabular" ? What are the problems with using "Table" everywhere throughout the GUI and the documentation (except whe