On 18 Jul 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Mike" == Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike> After I finish proofing the
> Mike> current docs, I plan to declare them set in stone for any
> Mike> possible 1.1.6fix3.
>
> When is that scheduled to happen?
If I can get them off my l
> "Mike" == Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> For the devvies who may be lurking here - is the 1.2.0 CVS
Mike> stable enough to use to start documenting 1.2.0 specific
Mike> features? Or am I better off waiting a bit until Lars declares a
Mike> true code freeze?
Some things are
> "Mike" == Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> After I finish proofing the
Mike> current docs, I plan to declare them set in stone for any
Mike> possible 1.1.6fix3.
When is that scheduled to happen?
JMarc
On Monday 16 July 2001 19:37, you wrote:
> I actually hope to have the "final" 1.1.6 docs completed and submitted
> this afternoon, tomorrow at the latest (if I can get my laptop's modem to
> cooperate). As you mention, this is mainly ensuring that all the menu
I'll look to getting the files ton
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:46:48PM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> > declare them set in stone for any possible 1.1.6fix3. The rearranging will
> > then occur in the 1.2 docs, even though I will be using 1.1.6 to
> > rearrange/edit them at first.
>
> How much
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:46:48PM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> declare them set in stone for any possible 1.1.6fix3. The rearranging will
> then occur in the 1.2 docs, even though I will be using 1.1.6 to
> rearrange/edit them at first.
How much work do you estimate this will take ? Specificall
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
> > also like to forge ahead with the 1.2.0 docs and some of the rearranging
> > we had discussed some weeks ago. If there is anything near and dear to
>
> Yes. Let me know where you want me to jump in... (Probably after removing
> the current innaccur
On Sunday 15 July 2001 23:13, Mike Ressler wrote:
> I will have some time to play with the docs this week. I intend to finish
> updating the 1.1.6 docs so that there aren't any inaccuracies, but I'd
Kewl.
> also like to forge ahead with the 1.2.0 docs and some of the rearranging
> we had discus
Hi gang,
I will have some time to play with the docs this week. I intend to finish
updating the 1.1.6 docs so that there aren't any inaccuracies, but I'd
also like to forge ahead with the 1.2.0 docs and some of the rearranging
we had discussed some weeks ago. If there is anything near and dear to
