On Tuesday 22 May 2001 12:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!!
What you are about to read is one *extremely* long message. (Over 200
lines!) I had a 'gestalt' after reading the other comments, and decided that
it was a concept that
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 12:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!!
What you are about to read is one *extremely* long message. (Over 200
lines!) I had a 'gestalt' after reading the other comments, and decided that
it was a concept that
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:05:10AM -0400, John Weiss wrote:
I think we can take the experience described above, iron out the tone
of frustration and aggravation, and present it in a
compare-and-contrast description of what LyX gives you over document
templates.
YES! Again, I did not mean to
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:05:10AM -0400, John Weiss wrote:
> I think we can take the experience described above, iron out the tone
> of frustration and aggravation, and present it in a
> compare-and-contrast description of what LyX gives you over "document
> templates".
YES! Again, I did not
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:42:57AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've presented some good ideas. Anyone else care to weigh in? I suspect
John W will have some strong thoughts on the matter - I'm not sure if he
reads this list or not.
Oh, I listen. ;) Real life, however, intrudes from
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:42:57AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> You've presented some good ideas. Anyone else care to weigh in? I suspect
> John W will have some strong thoughts on the matter - I'm not sure if he
> reads this list or not.
Oh, I listen. ;) Real life, however, intrudes
Hello George,
I've forwarded your message to the lyx-docs mailing list. If you haven't
subscribed to it yet, you should. It's very low volume - completely in
the noise compared to lyx-devel :-)
On Fri, 4 May 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
However, I was thinking while we aren't to the point of
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:42:57AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahem, there is a much ignored FAQ in the documentation. It even points to
Maybe, there should be some advertisement for it in Intro?
Herb's site. Given that Herb's site is so good, but focussed a bit more on
tips and
Hello George,
I've forwarded your message to the lyx-docs mailing list. If you haven't
subscribed to it yet, you should. It's very low volume - completely in
the noise compared to lyx-devel :-)
On Fri, 4 May 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
> However, I was thinking while we aren't to the point of
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:42:57AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ahem, there is a much ignored FAQ in the documentation. It even points to
Maybe, there should be some advertisement for it in Intro?
> Herb's site. Given that Herb's site is so good, but focussed a bit more on
> tips and
On Friday 04 May 2001 01:23, SoundChaser wrote:
Mike,
You have a volunteer right here. :) As I have been reading the
documentation lately, I've come across a number of things that I wuold
like to see revisited / revised. (Mostly things in tone of the
documentation...)
I'd also be happy
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:05:28AM -0400, Ronald Florence wrote:
Robin Turner writes:
2. Linux users who stumbled upon LyX in search of a good alternative to
Word(Perfect). No knowledge of LaTeX, but pretty computer-savvy. current
documentation is well suited to this group.
On Friday 04 May 2001 01:23, SoundChaser wrote:
> Mike,
>
> You have a volunteer right here. :) As I have been reading the
> documentation lately, I've come across a number of things that I wuold
> like to see revisited / revised. (Mostly things in tone of the
> documentation...)
I'd also be
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:05:28AM -0400, Ronald Florence wrote:
> Robin Turner writes:
>
> 2. Linux users who stumbled upon LyX in search of a good alternative to
> Word(Perfect). No knowledge of LaTeX, but pretty computer-savvy. current
> documentation is well suited to this group.
Mike,
You have a volunteer right here. :) As I have been reading the
documentation lately, I've come across a number of things that I wuold
like to see revisited / revised. (Mostly things in tone of the
documentation...)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Matej Cepl wrote:
On
Mike,
You have a volunteer right here. :) As I have been reading the
documentation lately, I've come across a number of things that I wuold
like to see revisited / revised. (Mostly things in tone of the
documentation...)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2001, Matej Cepl wrote:
> >
16 matches
Mail list logo
