Re: Strange thing with a table

1999-07-09 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, you wrote: > >%_ > Look a this table (file attached) > > When I do "view postscript", the final words of the second row are > missing. i.e "Medición de Fj", "Maquina de medicion de enlace [a nivel de > red is missing]". If I put in the top wall of the table cell and put the

Strange thing with a table

1999-07-09 Thread Julián Muñoz Domínguez
Look a this table (file attached) When I do "view postscript", the final words of the second row are missing. i.e "Medición de Fj", "Maquina de medicion de enlace [a nivel de red is missing]". __o _ \<_ (_)/(_) #This file was created by Fri Jul 9 16:11:48 1999 #LyX 1.0 (C) 1

RE: accent

1999-07-09 Thread John Ya-ya
Hi... On 09-Jul-99 Emanuele Olivetti wrote: > Hi all, > Is there some shortcut (I mean some Ctrl-something or Meta- )to write > accented vowels using a US keyboard ? > Using LaTeX ( \'e or other...) is the only way ? If you can set up a key on your US keyboard to act as a "Compose" key

accent

1999-07-09 Thread Emanuele Olivetti
Hi all, Is there some shortcut (I mean some Ctrl-something or Meta- )to write accented vowels using a US keyboard ? Using LaTeX ( \'e or other...) is the only way ? Thanks in advance. Emanuele

Re: RH6.0

1999-07-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Christophe" == Christophe GOZE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Christophe> Hi everyone, I installed Rh6.0 and all the lib and Christophe> headers. and I am not able to compile the last vesrion of Christophe> Lyx. Seems there is something wrong with the checking of Christophe> X Could you el

RH6.0

1999-07-09 Thread Christophe GOZE
Hi everyone, I installed Rh6.0 and all the lib and headers. and I am not able to compile the last vesrion of Lyx. Seems there is something wrong with the checking of X Note that I have RH5.2 on another PC and all is perfect in this case. Is anyone can help me ? Thanks -- Goze Christophe C

Re: FAQ: Delete row in multirow-cells

1999-07-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 08-Jul-99 jdd wrote: > > and don't forget the powerfull "undo"feature of lyx, very usefull in such case. > seriously, this seems to me very dangerous : same action, different results > We could remove this multi-row feature hack and all wait for lyx-1.2 do have a clean solution. What do you