sgmltools

2001-05-13 Thread Thomas Schönhoff
Hello to all, I am looking for "sgmltools 2.0" as mentioned in the help-docs for conversion to html. This weekend I tried serveral ways to get it but finally failed. Does anybody know where to get it! (the link to sgml.org is dead!!!) thanks in advance Thomas

Re: problem running lyx in windows

2001-05-13 Thread Allan Rae
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Wayne W. Szeto wrote: > I have downloaded "lyx116fix1.zip" from www.lyx.org, extracted it to my > cygwin directory, and ran the setup script successfully. When I try to > start up lyx by executing "runlyx.bat", it gives a "./xwin32" not found > error. I search through my di

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-13 Thread Kevin Gross
OK, that worked well. Now just a tiny problem remains. In the attached file, you will notice that the cell lines are a bit thicker for the first row than the other rows. Not sure why. At any rate, it is definitely good enough for me! Thanks for all your clever help. Kevin On Sunday 13 Ma

Re: LyX-SuSE 7.1-COL 2.4

2001-05-13 Thread EagleIce
On Friday 11 May 2001 20:30, EagleIce wrote: > On Friday 11 May 2001 19:28, Matej Cepl wrote: > > That's wrong -- you should have there setting both of them. Try to > > define these formats with their viewers and convertors. > > > > Matej > > Thank's for the help & the files. I'm not that good at

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 03:20:11PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote: > Your suggestion worked perfectly, well almost perfectly. Attached is a > sample LyX file containing a table using your trick. It works perfectly for > the numbers in the table. I disabled the trick for the 1st row by making > eac

sgml to LyX

2001-05-13 Thread Roberto Arcomano
Hi all, I ask again for my problem, translation from sgml to LyX format. If I create a LyX document with an URL, then I export it to SGML (LinuxDoc) and in the end I import it to LyX, URL is different (without double-click modifying) and my new LyX document becomes more large than the origin

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-13 Thread Kevin Gross
Your suggestion worked perfectly, well almost perfectly. Attached is a sample LyX file containing a table using your trick. It works perfectly for the numbers in the table. I disabled the trick for the 1st row by making each a multicolumn cell and manually changing the column alignment to "c

Re: latex error

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello again lyx'rs > > Latex is unable to find *.cls and others. I have check out and this files are >already installed in: > /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex > How can I do? did you run command texhash after installing? and a reconfigure from lyx if you have also new layo

Re: numbering theorems

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello Lyx'rs > > 1. How can I number theorems? > 2. How can I number theorems by section? look at the eamble-file: http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/data/algorithm.lyx Herbert -- http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

latex error

2001-05-13 Thread nakedmind
Hello again lyx'rs Latex is unable to find *.cls and others. I have check out and this files are already installed in: /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex How can I do? Pierre Get your own FREE E-mail address at http://www.linuxfreemail.com Linux FREE Mail is 100% FREE, 100% Linux, and 100% yours!

numbering theorems

2001-05-13 Thread nakedmind
Hello Lyx'rs 1. How can I number theorems? 2. How can I number theorems by section? Pierre Get your own FREE E-mail address at http://www.linuxfreemail.com Linux FREE Mail is 100% FREE, 100% Linux, and 100% yours!

problem running lyx in windows

2001-05-13 Thread Wayne W. Szeto
I have downloaded "lyx116fix1.zip" from www.lyx.org, extracted it to my cygwin directory, and ran the setup script successfully. When I try to start up lyx by executing "runlyx.bat", it gives a "./xwin32" not found error. I search through my disk but couldn't find it. Is it a seperate package t

Re: Large table full of numbers

2001-05-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:35:01PM -0400, Kevin Gross wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a set of tabular data. A considerable amount of the numbers are > negative. I can easily create a table of the appropriate dimensions in lyx > and paste in my data from an editor. However, in the final output, t

Re: Two definitions after each other

2001-05-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 09:18:02AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > Otto Tronarp wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > how can I have two definitions after eachother in AMS-article. I wan't > > to have somthing like this: > > Definition 1. My 1st definition > > Definition 2. My 2nd definition > > i suppose you

Re: \not\parallel - \nparallel

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Voss
Wolfgang Kilian wrote: > Hello again me, > sorry but I've again a simple problem. In a tex-book I've written that there is a >command \nparallel, Due to the fact that the symbol which is createt with >'\not\parallel' in math mode (lyx 1.1.5.fix1) does not loo like it should. > But when I use

Re: diameter symbol in lyx 1.1.5

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Voss
Wolfgang Kilian wrote: > hello all you freaks, > i tried to crate a diameter symbol (/o on each oterh) in lyx 1.1.5.fix1. > What i did was in math mode a '\not o' and in lyx it seemd to be ok. But in PS it >looked like '/o'. Schould i write the complete math mode in red ie: package wasysym \d

\not\parallel - \nparallel

2001-05-13 Thread Wolfgang Kilian
Hello again me, sorry but I've again a simple problem. In a tex-book I've written that there is a command \nparallel, Due to the fact that the symbol which is createt with '\not\parallel' in math mode (lyx 1.1.5.fix1) does not loo like it should. But when I use the command \nparallel i get an

diameter symbol in lyx 1.1.5

2001-05-13 Thread Wolfgang Kilian
hello all you freaks, i tried to crate a diameter symbol (/o on each oterh) in lyx 1.1.5.fix1. What i did was in math mode a '\not o' and in lyx it seemd to be ok. But in PS it looked like '/o'. Schould i write the complete math mode in red ie: $\not o$ Thanks in advance Wolfgang __