It is perhaps a surprising feature of LyX's ERT boxes that they don't
have to be individually syntactically well-formed LaTeX expressions.
Thus, you could have in one ERT box "\emph{" followed by some text (not
in ERT -- just ordinary text), followed by a second ERT box containing
"}". In this
On Thursday 22 April 2004 17:11, Bennett Helm wrote:
> It is perhaps a surprising feature of LyX's ERT boxes that they don't
> have to be individually syntactically well-formed LaTeX expressions.
This is not just useful for spellchecking: it makes the text within the ERT
visible as normal text in
Thanks for your answer! I understand your point of view. However,
sometimes, it is unavoidable the use of ERTs containing relevant text.
For instance, I am writing a document in which I use the package
enumerate. To use that package, it seems that it is really necessary
(up to my best knowledge
On Apr 22, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
Paul> I agree with you. However, according to the search that I did in
Paul> the archives of the list, ERTs are not spell-checked, what is
Paul> surprising. Of course that this LyX's limitation is not serious,
Paul> as one can always spell-check one'
Paul> I agree with you. However, according to the search that I did in
Paul> the archives of the list, ERTs are not spell-checked, what is
Paul> surprising. Of course that this LyX's limitation is not serious,
Paul> as one can always spell-check one's LyX document externally,
Paul> through aspell (
> "Alain" == Alain DIDIERJEAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alain> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:20:24AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Alain> wrote:
>> Not spellchecking ERT is intentional, since they are not supposed
>> to contain a lot of real words (ideally, they are not supposed to
>> contain wo
Dear list,
I have use headings in my document and it is realized with the following
LATEX-preambel (page-style is fancy):
\lhead{text...}
\rhead{}
\chead{}
\lfoot{text}
It looks quite fine but my professor wants it in a box and with grey or
blue background.
All trials with
\fbox etc.
only produ
> "Paul" == Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> I agree with you. However, according to the search that I did in
Paul> the archives of the list, ERTs are not spell-checked, what is
Paul> surprising. Of course that this LyX's limitation is not serious,
Paul> as one can always spell-che
Rainer Worbis wrote:
> im using lyx 1.3.3 for my work without a bibtex database. Sometimes
> citation references will grow out of the margin of the paper.
> How can I avoid this?
If you don't use natbib:
\usepackage{cite}
Jürgen.
Should not spellchecker pass through ERTs? I am writing a document where
that does not happen. Any ideas?
IMHO, it should check ERT, as there might be visible text inside an ERT
(example: psfrag replacement text).
However, LyX should start ispell in TeX mode, so the ispell-internal
skipping of (La
10 matches
Mail list logo
