Am 09.03.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (o
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
sid) in the repos? And doe
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>> wrote:
Thanks, Liviu,
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
sid) in the repos? A
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>> mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>> wrote:
>> Thanks, Liviu,
>> would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
>> sid) in the repos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contai
Am 09.03.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>> wrote:
Thanks, Liviu,
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
sid) in the repos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contain
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Thanks, Liviu,
>
> would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or sid) in the
> repos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contain already the bibtex related
> error reporting? These are the reason
Am 08.03.2017 um 21:50 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>> wrote:
Am 08.03.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
mailto:engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>>