On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Michael Berger wrote:
Would this perhaps help as it does in my linguistic and other documents?
%instruction to LATEX not to run lines into the margins
%Thanks to Jürgen Spitzmüller for this piece of fine advice
\tolerance 1414
\hbadness 1414
\emergencystretch 1.5em
\hfuzz
Sorry, as advised by Paul Rubin I am now addressing the list! ;-)
Michael
Would this perhaps help as it does in my linguistic and other documents?
Michael Berger
%instruction to LATEX not to run lines into the margins
%Thanks to Jürgen Spitzmüller for this piece of fine advice
\tolerance
Sorry, as advised by Paul Rubin I am now addressing the list ;-)
Michael Berger
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: URL inserts that overfill lines
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 14:43:33 +0100
From: Michael Berger
To: parubi...@gmail.com
Would this perhaps help as it
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't recall URLs ever wrapping automatically. In the past, I would add
hyphens at places where I wanted the URL to wrap, which is a bit clunky
(since a change in preceding text can change where the wrap needs to
happen). You might check out the xurl
This is a new issue with kbibtex. Technical report reference in the
bibliography include the document type, Tech. rept., even though that's not
in the bibtex source in the kbibtex database. Three examples of the output
and their source listings (minus the abstracts):
Brinson, M.M. 1993. A
On 10/31/19 7:46 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
I had the impression that inserted URLs automatically wrapped when they
extended past the text width. In a current document they don't wrap.
My solution was to put the URLs in footnotes rather than in parentheses
after the organization name.
Is there a
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Baris Erkus wrote:
How does it appear on the generated PDF file?
Baris,
As (wet) rather than as (WET).
LyX has its own formatting of references, which is most of the time NOT
same as the bibtex format you are using.
I hadn't encountered this issue (and another I need
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 4:55 AM, list_em...@icloud.com wrote:
>
> I am using the Article class with the Roman font set to Utopia (Fourier). I
> believe that “Fourier” indicates a compatible math font, complementing Utopia.
>
> The integral signs for single and double integrals are different! I
